切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 17428阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 +bU(-yRy5o  
    'UCL?$  
    xNU}uW>>T  
    >d |W>|8e  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 =s<QN*zJB0  
    IFe[3mB5  
    _1QNO#X  
    :mL.Y em*'  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: $@X,J2&  
    3@SfCG&|e  
    Analysis of Tolerances 54-x 14")  
    I;LqyzM  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX 3dfSu'  
    Title: A2 r RYzN;  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 ,KWeW^z'7  
    '=xl}v  
    Units are Millimeters. y!].l0e2a  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. H.e@w3+h  
    $U1'n@/J  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. 9dAsXEWh  
    i "xq SLf=  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. dBkB9nz  
    1Y_fX  
    Mnemonics: !G37K8 &&*  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. Mmn[ol  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. `*B8IT)  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. HukHZ;5  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. .,4&/cd  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). o3yZCz  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). mDhU wZH  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). 5 m:nh<)#  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. Nz8iU@!a  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. *)Y;`Yg$  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. BFY~::<b  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). mdwY48b  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). 'W)x<Iey1  
    -kkXyO8js  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. [Z1EjeX  
    %(i(ZW "  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. }-!$KR]:s  
    ({)_[dJ'  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm i ):el=  
    Mode                : Sensitivities FU<rE&X2:  
    Sampling            : 2 RZ -w,~  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 r&#q=R},p  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 d 1z   
    IMBqy-q  
    {Su]P {oJ  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees {\k9%2V*+  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY IBR;q[Dj}  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 SL(Q;_  
    Y?> S.B7  
    Sensitivity Analysis: |Q$C%7  
    R1U\/  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| /g2 1.*Z  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change dK=BH=S2?X  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 uzsR*x%s-  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 oY{*X6:6<  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 =w8*n2  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 q,2 @X~T  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 ?[kO= hs  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ; qvZ*  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 *H;&hq  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 E3`KO'v%  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 B]jh$@  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 ;$nK ^  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 P0W%30Dh  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 n^'{{@&(v  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 1r@v \#P  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 `toSU>:  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 M jHeUf  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 7"M7N^  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 -i 9/1.Z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 }(gXlF  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 ;DGp7f#9  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 KExfa4W 3{  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5e/%Tue.  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) $UKDXQF"  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 7%JXVP}A  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 v%_sCg  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) `OduBUI]]  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 i`E]gJ$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 9~a_^m/  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 5^ pQ=Sgt  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 )Y)7p//  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 j+s8V-7(  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 K":- zS  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 YV0e)bf  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Dt8eVWkN~  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 _w)0r}{  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 qbB.Z#w  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 d ;ry!X  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 NJn~XCq  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 w W-GBY3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5C/u`{4]Hg  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 s9@IOE GAt  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 &u$l2hSS  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 E|#'u^`yv  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 u{8Wu;  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 H,] D}r  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 gm4-w 9M[p  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 @"Do8p!*(6  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 g~N)~]0{  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 * _U z**M  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 _M{m6k(h  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 &AA u:  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _Tev503  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 (n#  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 =yk#z84<  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ==Ju2D?%  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 ^k~{6S,  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 T7&itgEYG/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 U.d*E/OR5  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 R0{+Xd  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 3 nb3rHQ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0s= GM|y  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 _k _F  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 LTG/gif[u  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 F^KoEWj[H  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes WF_G GF{  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 LKztGfy  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 l0Y(9(M@  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes DH @*Oz-  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 R>#T {<<L  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ( ]'4_~e  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes zaR~fO  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 j @sd x)1+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /\h&t6B1  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 uflp4_D   
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 X=_N7!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 XA>@0E>1r  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 i7:j(W^I8  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 j =[Td   
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 4LKOBiEM  
    RVX-3FvP  
    Worst offenders: 4e1Zyi!  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change %;9wToyK>  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 8M8=uw~#  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 %F1 Ce/  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 sm/l'e  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 wIL5-k,  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 cD]{ Nn  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 n+j'FfSz  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 rEz=\yY^j'  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 5H`k$[3V  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 &`0heJ 5Yn  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 `QAotSO+  
    "P'W@  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: $v$~.  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 ~~b[X\1  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 u%3Z +[  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003  ,`)!K}2  
    #2{ };)  
    Compensator Statistics: =A GsW  
    Change in back focus: |'b=xeH.^<  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 }=az6cLE2  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 jvCk+n[  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 2Pasmh  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 ?UQE;0 B  
    0:Ak 4L6k  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: 7-Fh!=\f/  
    Number of trials: 20 %dKUB4  
    >& \QLo[5  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution `4g m'C  
    6ZR'1_i6i=  
      Trial       Criterion        Change 9=K=gfZ  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 O.  V!L  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 l%rwJLN1  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 CXb)k.L   
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 7P.C~,+D%P  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 f'TdYG  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 b-;+&Rb  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 X-e)w  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 cc Z A  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 -_4U+Cfmtl  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 =VH, i/@  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 hF.9\X]  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 Ti=~ycwi  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 "fL:scq@0  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 9=&LMjTQ  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 bWW$_S pr  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 vLXN{ ]  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 $7T3wv9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 #7/_Usso  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 )R<hYd  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 Ir_K8 3VM  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 ?Xx,[Z&  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 ~Q0gSazXFt  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 /q ;MihK  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 0~<d<a -@  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 S=n,unn#t  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 2n2{Oy>L  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 EX~ U(JB6  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 YrS%Yvhj0  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 pkWzaf  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 k ?X  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 -y1%c^36_J  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 a<B[ ~J4i  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 l23_K7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 +FP*RNM  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 k+f!)7_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 #Wey)DI  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 >sv|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 &~29%Ns  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 np}F [v  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 L 5J=+k,  
    Bmm#5X@*  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 Tar tV3;`  
    l4I@6@  
    Nominal     0.54403234 )c b e 4  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 @kK${  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 (Eq0 |"cj  
    Mean        0.35770970 )@DH&  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 )2C_6eR  
    K, ae-#wgb  
    HeZ! "^w  
    Compensator Statistics: jhr{JApbJv  
    Change in back focus: *-(J$4RNz  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 RLOB  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 f^@`[MJj1C  
    Mean               :         0.161872 rR@ t5  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 s PYG?P(l  
    >:!TfuU^R  
    90% >       0.20977951               W'hE,  
    80% >       0.22748071               GJ edW   
    50% >       0.38667627               (9]`3^_,J  
    20% >       0.46553746               v|C)Q %v  
    10% >       0.50064115                9JV(}v5[  
    x48Y#"'  
    End of Run. D *RF._  
    dVmI.A'nbp  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 J)vP<.3:  
    8aQ\Yx  
    $m]~d6  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 {|c <8  
    {y0#(8-&  
    不吝赐教
    本主题包含附件,请 登录 后查看, 或者 注册 成为会员
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 xzTTK+D@  
    80% >       0.22748071                 ${Cb1|g>j  
    50% >       0.38667627                 RO?5WJpPj  
    20% >       0.46553746                 :c3}J<Z  
    10% >       0.50064115 NKf][!bi  
    %SuEfCM  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? {)nm {IV,  
    HTiqErD2_  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   ~&B{"d  
    L1ZhH3}X  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : $:IOoS|e  
    90% >       0.20977951                 H",w$$e F  
    80% >       0.22748071                 Ia_I~ U$  
    50% >       0.38667627                 $="t7C9S  
    20% >       0.46553746                 B-Bgk  
    10% >       0.50064115 +M4X r *  
    ....... _<tWy+.  
    GJ YXCi  
    0>@D{_}s  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   n~~0iU )  
    Mode                : Sensitivities `qP <S  
    Sampling            : 2 mOiA}BGw  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 b| e7mis@  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 $|J16tW  
    M#<U=Ha  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? ZUDdLJ  
    jC<1bf$K  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试