切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15414阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    在线sansummer
     
    发帖
    958
    光币
    1062
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 ]mLTF',5  
    Hh'14n&W  
    (k2J{6]  
    4`'BaUU(  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 pl^"1Z=*  
    odT7Gq  
    F~0%j}ve  
    }rAN2D]"}  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: B,na  
    (P52KD[A[  
    Analysis of Tolerances 'I01F:`  
    JV6U0$g_S  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX m^u&g&^  
    Title: $\J9F=<a  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 iJj?~\zp  
    @Y<ZT;J  
    Units are Millimeters. CFrHNU  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. Vh[o[ U  
    Rb>RjHo S  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. vgbjvyfN  
    ~b<4>"7y.  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. 1AEVZ@(j7  
    aD3F!Sn  
    Mnemonics: VNEZBy"F  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. aKFA&Xnsl  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. */dsMa  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. 3ij I2Zy  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. 'L+BkE6+%  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). :W<,iqSCm  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). "Ohpb!J9  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). ;7=J U^@D@  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. .AI'L|FQ%c  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. H5MAN,`  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. oX~$'/2v  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). U:p"IY#%  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). + T-zf@j  
    vrO$8* sy  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. Bst>9V&R  
    T9v#Jb6  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. GyM%vGl 3  
    5i-;bLm  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm + d)~;I$  
    Mode                : Sensitivities |[7$) $  
    Sampling            : 2 1,!\7@<CT  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 92ww[+RQ@  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 6@*;Wk~  
    4bjp*1*]  
    2o}G<7r  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees _N#3lU?  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY MxA'T(Ay  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 6e-h;ylS  
    0guc00IN  
    Sensitivity Analysis: `V2j[Fz  
    ~g6[ [  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| tSLl'XeN  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change u,9U0ua@;  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 ew ,edU  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 kAQZj3P]  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 2s ,n!u Fd  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 NJ!#0[@C  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 [!efQap  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 BQ)43Rr>  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 n|2-bRK-  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 5!{g6=(  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 aT1 W] i  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 `mTxtuid{  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 eL4@% ]o  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 g' U^fN  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 ri V/wN9C  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 Y[]t_o)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 T0)y5  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 0|vWwZq  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 hRcJ):Wyb  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 9+|,aG s  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 2Yjysn  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005  +6-!o,(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 YAG3PWmD  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) )O(Gw-jWE  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 f TtMmz  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000  Q'M Ez  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) OB@t(KNx*P  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 ?q&mI*j!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 [6qP;  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 2xj`cFT  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 p5BcDYOw`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _( Cp   
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 55KL^+-~  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 tC~itU=V  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 {<BK@U  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 \./2Qc,  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 2p[3Ap  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 |mA*[?ye@  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 yln.E vJjD  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 |{"7/~*[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 B 1.@K}  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 8RD)yRJ  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 :AGQkJb  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 :M`BVZ1t  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 5E|2 S_)G  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 i*>yUav"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ((q(Q9(F  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 :]jtV~E\  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324   {`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 t9{EO#o' k  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 ajr8tp'  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 @ U|u _S@  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (#`o >G(  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 =c 4U%d2  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 mg]dKp  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xn[di-L F  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 C(hg"_W ou  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 A/aQpEb%  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #1k,t  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 T]`" Xl8  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 v_ h{_b8  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 j=4>In?x  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 iDJ2dM}v  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ;wZ.p"T9^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 mD3#$E!A1  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes LPF?\mf ^4  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 rK wkj)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 WH*&MIjAr/  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes }X-ggO,  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 #u^d3 $Nj  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Sa5y7   
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes RqR  X  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 g-36Q~`9v  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 GYO"1PM  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 xH uyfQLk  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 ?Fu.,srt  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 AaVlNjB  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 @}:(t{>;e7  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 ;p8xL)mUP  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 pz+#1=b]  
    TuL( /  
    Worst offenders: *6DKU CA/  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change  3@*8\  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 u QCS%|8C  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 yFjSvm6  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 2z:9^a/]Na  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 X +R_TC  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 cxV3Vrx@A  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 X*@S j;|m  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 |>)mYLN!y  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 -L@=j  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 }<p%PyM  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 &CgD smJo#  
    :M16ijkx  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: wuCODz@~  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 nm..$QL  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 $1YnQgpT  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 S3w? X  
    +}]xuYzo  
    Compensator Statistics: qW*)]s)z  
    Change in back focus: gueCP+a_  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 pB`<4+"9  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 Flsf5 Tr0  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 ZC"p^~U_e[  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 H`sV\'`!}  
    qmhHHFjQ  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: \TjsXy=:)  
    Number of trials: 20 "Z <1Msz  
    3~ylBJJ  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution hz!.|U@,{<  
    0t8-oui  
      Trial       Criterion        Change HzV3O-Qz]  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 'a}pWkLB  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 :v#3;('7  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 YRFM1?*  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 \O56!,k  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 gO29:L[t  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 9"[#\TW9Vb  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 YvonZ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 ]*).3<Lw  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 lq74Fz&(  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 o}BaZ|iZ2  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 WE\V<MGS/  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 IIzdCa{l  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 z?7pn}-  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 b$hQB090  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 @>?&Mw\c  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 (c;$^xZK  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 >Gkkr{s9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 .M04n\  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 i9Qx{f88  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 uTQ/_$  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 2!A/]:[F  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 SKGYmleR  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 8d-_'MXk3  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 \%UA6uj  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 % %*t{0!H+  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 I<DS07K  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 F[LBQI`zq  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 "[76>\'H  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 Pt E>08  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 LbnR=B!  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 {JMFCc[  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 Pl U!-7  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353  QHOem=B  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 P7Kp*He)  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 K*>lq|i u  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 _rOKif?5  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 bPWIf*3#  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 ))<3+^S0V\  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 b2hB'!m  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 uk16  
    'F1NBL   
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 't]=ps  
    VUk2pEGO.  
    Nominal     0.54403234 u9J;OsnHK  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 +c?1\{M   
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 |nIm$p'  
    Mean        0.35770970 Ga"t4[=I  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 7Q2"]f,$CQ  
    !ce5pA  
    !h4L_D0  
    Compensator Statistics: <^{|5u  
    Change in back focus: {x  s{  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 >O?5mfMK  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 ,*Jm\u  
    Mean               :         0.161872 r!'\$(m E  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 b+,u_$@B  
    f3h^R20qmO  
    90% >       0.20977951               5 ^+> *z  
    80% >       0.22748071               YQLp#  
    50% >       0.38667627               _Uc le  
    20% >       0.46553746               hT]\*},  
    10% >       0.50064115                %&0_0BU  
    UoCFj2?C  
    End of Run. se2ay_<F+  
    a!vF;J-Zqa  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 q3n(Z  
    f 0D9Mp  
    l*rli[No  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 dX?8@uzu  
    %i:Sf  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    958
    光币
    1062
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    958
    光币
    1062
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 `tZm  
    80% >       0.22748071                 XqX6UEVR4  
    50% >       0.38667627                 "-bsWC  
    20% >       0.46553746                 y(!J8(yA  
    10% >       0.50064115 +a7J;-|  
    2GkJ7cL  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? oS.fy31p  
    Cp{ j+Ia  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   jr,j1K@_t  
    *>"k/XUn$  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    958
    光币
    1062
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : g(9\r  
    90% >       0.20977951                 P[|FK(l  
    80% >       0.22748071                 XI>|"*-l  
    50% >       0.38667627                 ^4D7sS;~3  
    20% >       0.46553746                 Qf?5"=:#  
    10% >       0.50064115 *T acV p  
    ....... =e<;B_ ~.  
    A(!nT=0o  
    ?k6P H"M  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   J2c.J/o  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 37 #|X*L  
    Sampling            : 2 mY}_9rTn|  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 )kMA_\$,  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 @@!Mt~\  
    ,34|_  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    958
    光币
    1062
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? _`Ojh0@00  
    1l@gZI12#/  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    958
    光币
    1062
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试