切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 17772阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 >NN|vj  
    ?wps_XU  
    [|2uu."$  
    YZCPS6PuE  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 N1UE u,j  
    : 5@cj j  
    qFV=P k  
    WT!8.M;Kv  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: &50Kn[  
    C"/]X  
    Analysis of Tolerances j=)%~@  
    (~TP  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX }Kq5!XJV9C  
    Title: Uq/(xh,t5  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 @T1/S&F=  
    {Gs&u>>R"^  
    Units are Millimeters. #3$U&|`  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. YE5v~2  
    Dd*T5A?  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. q+32|k>)  
    Ifu$p]~z$  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. R,A|"Q  
    -o F#a 8  
    Mnemonics: "2CiW6X[M  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. M~7?m/Wj  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness.  "t8mQ;n  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. )%C482GO-  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. DRi!WWivn  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). B|%=<1?  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). tqrvcnQr^  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). BoP%f '0N  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. _3T*[s;H  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. T}2a~  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. ']f]:X;6 w  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). uavts9v<  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). w"-bO ~5h  
    ZzI^*Nyg  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. ;4F[*VF!w  
    P-No;/!B#  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. `R8~H7{I6  
    (H+'sf^h  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm n<lU;  
    Mode                : Sensitivities m |,ocz  
    Sampling            : 2 Z|d_G}  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 D}!U?]la&  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 e?L$RY,7  
    ,y2ur2  
    ,D3q8?j  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees X!,Ngmw.  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY D2>EG~xWq  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 a|5GC pp  
    "6pjkEt4  
    Sensitivity Analysis: Qkqn~>  
    Dw[w%uz  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| >g93Bj*  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change BD=;4SLT  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 |fTQ\q]W  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 &.<{c `-  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 wC=IN   
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 % C6 H(  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 xvp{F9~qT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 .1|'9@]lj4  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 $j{ynh)^  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 66)@4 3V  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 Os@ofnC  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 ZQl[h7c/N  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 1Q?hskL  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 c!Pi)  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 7GK| A{r  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 "VcGr#zW  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 [(ty{  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 g-}Vu1w0{6  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 Q:-H U bB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 S*#y7YKI  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 0yAvAx  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 {,s:vPoiA  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 b;m6m4i'f{  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) 2[M:WZ.1  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 mL6/NSSz  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Q `E{Oo,  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) eX_}KH-Q  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 x:l`e:`y9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 h.2!d0j]  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 IUc!nxF#  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 L1rov  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 6Mk@,\1  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 R>gj"nB  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 um3 M4>K  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Uut,cQ". d  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 &nz1[,  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 N.-Ryj&9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 sL&u%7>Re  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 Tm3$|+}$f  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 7ky(g'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 =C#,aoa!  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 I}k!i+Yl  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 ]E=JUYf0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /;.M$}Z>`  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 ARU,Wtj#  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 &G<ZK9Ot}0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Z6h.gaQ7 H  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 &S|laq H  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 0|GxOzNd  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 lsio\ $  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 ,#WXAA mm  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 4El{2cfA  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 r2sog{R  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 3`e1:`Hu  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 ^?J:eB!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Yhlk#>I  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 <:&w/NjbI  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 HPpnw] _  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0q`'65 lx  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 R9#Z= f,  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 BC4u,4S  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 eq4<   
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 'QW 0K]il  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ekAGzu  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 TR%?U/_4;r  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes ^NnZYr.  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 9f"6Jw@F  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /?J_7Lg  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes qmL!"ZRLF  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 |x kixf4zz  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 dG)A-qbV  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes 3}T&|@*  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 <B``/EX^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 9X*q^u  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 z$YOV"N  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 fi,=z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 { _ 1q`5o  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 &<>A  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 oNEU?+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 c dGl[dQ/  
    "thu@~aC  
    Worst offenders: twN(]w}Ps|  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change 'Klz`)F  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 |w>DZG!}1-  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 x208^=F\\  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 hB^"GYZ  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 )8N/t6Q  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 jgO{DNe(=  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ER|5_  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 |mM7P^I  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 t)v#y!Ci"  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ,~kMkBkl~  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ^#Z(&/5f0  
    Cn{UzSKfs  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: Cy2X>Tl"<E  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 ~&q e"0  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 \Lc]6?,R  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 ahf$#UQLb  
    U{_O=S u  
    Compensator Statistics: =AAH}  
    Change in back focus: 9c?izpA  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 S_WY91r  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 ![V<vIy  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 ^wHO!$  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 :@3d  
    Wx-{F  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: UU !I@  
    Number of trials: 20 # K-Q/*  
    rms&U)?  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution ,onv `  
     m$cM+  
      Trial       Criterion        Change g 08 `=g  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 C1nQZtF R  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 w5|"cD#8A  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 WFdS#XfV  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 iN)@Cu7  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 bEE:6)]G  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 #" OKO6]  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 p;H1,E:Re#  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 9 o18VJR  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 Z*Y?"1ar  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 j IW:O  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 W"0#  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 q\/|nZO4  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 ~Ch`A@=5  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 }1>a71  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 YA|*$$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 HWd,1  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 n/6A@C  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 xv ja  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 |~/{lE=I  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393  z/ i3  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 2<O hO ^  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 1ERz:\  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 TwkzX|  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 WV6vM()#!C  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 'X?`+2wK   
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 4VooU [Ka(  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 qd.b&i  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 3! +5MsR+  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 BAPi<U'D  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 [sad}@R7  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 3646.i[D  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 ;L`'xFo>>  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 a[u8x mH  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 N8vWwN[3  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 V*AG0@& !  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 I;`V*/s8"  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 B845BSmh  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 %_u3Np  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 LY|h*a6Ym  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 x}roPhZ  
    B|%;(bM2C  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 S*]IR"YL  
    tsk}]@W  
    Nominal     0.54403234 pUPb+:^R  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 }l/md/C0  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 z#\Z|OKU  
    Mean        0.35770970 fT@#S}t  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 !pN,,H6Y  
    e*g; +nz  
    Qh*|mW  
    Compensator Statistics: "<&F=gV  
    Change in back focus: saV3<zgx  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 |9%>R*  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 "L ,FUo^&  
    Mean               :         0.161872 tSm|U<  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 $'&5gFr9  
    T#( s2  
    90% >       0.20977951               7e40 }n  
    80% >       0.22748071               06ueE\@Sg  
    50% >       0.38667627               HU'd/5fun  
    20% >       0.46553746               EfyF]cYL  
    10% >       0.50064115                p5bH- km6  
    s<5t}{x  
    End of Run. :4WwCpgz,  
    \Lc pl-;?  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 >Z3}WMgBN  
    uwIZzz  
    w3& F e=c  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 )jH"6my_  
    Zj}, VB*T  
    不吝赐教
    本主题包含附件,请 登录 后查看, 或者 注册 成为会员
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 KDY~9?}TM  
    80% >       0.22748071                 :Ct} ||9/  
    50% >       0.38667627                 MBa/-fD  
    20% >       0.46553746                 mG2}JWA  
    10% >       0.50064115 .t["kaA  
    KcSvf;sx  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? ^i\zMMR  
    mB!81%f%|  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   B[Tw0rQ  
    XL"e<P;t  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : *BSL=8G{  
    90% >       0.20977951                 %Uuhi&PA-l  
    80% >       0.22748071                 lKe aI  
    50% >       0.38667627                 >yT:eG  
    20% >       0.46553746                 *S ;v406  
    10% >       0.50064115 dmf~w_(7  
    ....... N>@AsI  
    WT!%FQ9  
    /(vT49(]  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   377$c;4 F  
    Mode                : Sensitivities -6Cxz./#yS  
    Sampling            : 2 2,dG Rf  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 /I: d<A  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 +dR$;!WB3  
    v!40>[?|p  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? # |2w^Kn  
    XKMJsEP sW  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试