切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 17769阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 4/YEkD  
    b<,Z^Z_  
    T \%{zz_(  
    .w5#V|   
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 ^Q!qJav  
    (2J_Y*N~>  
    k^3 ?Z2a  
    ?^]29p_  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: !z@QoD  
    _22;hnG<iy  
    Analysis of Tolerances ga0>J_  
    rN6 @=uB  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX KV1zx(WI  
    Title: ]D|sQPi]F  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 1(!w xJ  
    tI50z khaB  
    Units are Millimeters. 1Xy{&Ut\  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. &_X6m0z  
    ,VZ;=  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. Z}bUvr XP  
    s+Qm/ h2  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. {SH +lX0]{  
    Dw}8ci'  
    Mnemonics: p x;X}Cd  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. Oi{X \Y  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. L \0nO i  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. =L_L/"*rel  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. zt/p' khP3  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). \(UEjlo  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). ?D P]#9/4  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). b_ 88o-*/  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. ow:}NI  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. I"awvUP]a[  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. 6itp Mck  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). S0.   
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). u@d`$]/>F  
    $Yfm>4  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. q^}QwJw  
    /BC(O[P  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. [ bv>(a_,  
    .<JD'%?"  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm e6s-;  
    Mode                : Sensitivities $LUNA.  
    Sampling            : 2 v8! 1"FYL  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 FG8genCH@  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 0Eq.l<  
    iN%\wkx*N  
    <qH>[ \  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees u?[P@_i<  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY 2%g)0[1  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 k1y&' 3%  
    [.tqgU  
    Sensitivity Analysis: Zcd!y9]#  
    (n7 v $A  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| GCul6,w  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change O?Xg%k#  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 L+Q"z*W  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 jYKs| J)[  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 +) 2c\1  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 ;;BQuG  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 q[]EVs0$ew  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 b\~rL,7(  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 m MO:m8W  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 rly3f  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 hnS ~r4  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 *g&[?y`UC  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 ~V3pj('/)'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 pLMki=.Ld  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 &,Dh*)k  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 M`HXUA4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 'LIJpk3J  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 j<!rc>)2+L  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 s9) @$3\  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 FCQIfJ#  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 En 3Q%  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 7dI+aJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 X tZ0z?  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) Bn*D<<{T  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 S:{hgi,T*  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 # 4`*`)%  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) c:"*MM RC  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 lwPK^)|}  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 7)G- EAF  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 1g{`1[.QO  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 n5"rSgUtE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 k7)H %31;  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 E,E:WuB  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 Zeyhr\T  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 mzTF2K  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 ftsr-3!Vm  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ":?>6'*1  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 DIodQkF  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 <9eQ  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 3nf+ imAF  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Lhu2;F\/  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 ORlz1 &hW  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 ^Qz8`1`;Z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 'R8VCj  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 F6Zl#eL  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 :6PWU$z$7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 g"]%5Ow1  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 z.oDH<1  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 )zI<C=])"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 IJO`"da  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 j#y_#  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ' ^gF  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ~\DC )  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 |ap{+ xh  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 wA) NB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 qO[6?q=c:  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 dz &| 3o  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 %k{~Fa  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 g"( vl-Uw  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 _WtX8  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 DzO0V"+H}k  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &M=12>ah]  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 o+`W  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 RfDIwkpp  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 CjORL'3  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes A,e/y  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 mN@)b+~(S  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 r vVU5zA4H  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes 6 +^V  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 4?g~GI3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 o1MI&}r  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes :Y(Yk5  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 UtG@0(6C  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 @)m[: n  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 D4G*K*z,w4  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 D}px=?  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 3 =@7:4 A  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 D; H</5#Q  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 Hs~M!eK  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 .\X/o!xC  
    7<x0LW  
    Worst offenders: 4O9HoX#-?  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change gl:vJD  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 @5\OM#WT~&  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 6Bmv1n[X^h  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 \% !]qv  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 f'TjR#w  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 kI]i,v#F  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 _a8^AG  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 IE: x&q`3  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 X}0NeG^'O  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 o DPs xw  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 =r3Yt9  
    Thn-8DT  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: xO9,,w47  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 FT/H~|Z>  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 jIv+=b#oT  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 .hn{m9|U  
    Q/\ <rG4  
    Compensator Statistics: [{6]iJ  
    Change in back focus: /],:sS7  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 hz<kR@k}  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 I?J$";A  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 6=Kl[U0Y  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 fU!C:  
    :m_0WT  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: ,[,+ _A  
    Number of trials: 20  7.CzS  
    )M#~/~^f+  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution v+znKpE  
    k`Ab*M$@Xs  
      Trial       Criterion        Change )K -@{v^|  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 FlOKTY   
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 )AXTi4MNp  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 /8q7pwV  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 tNjb{(eO\h  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 0@C`QW%m  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 zu(/ c  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 Z$X2*k6PK  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 rVzj LkN^  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 gmLGK1  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 L:%ek3SOz  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 _jy*`$"q (  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878  DC]FY|ff  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 7`6n]4e  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 L7G':oA_`p  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 rs~RKTv-  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 aN ). G1  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 h\Op|#gIT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 }(Nb]_H  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 ~)tIO<$U  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 SgAY/#  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 )6PZ.s/F6p  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 DvF`KHsy  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 mJc'oG-  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 o(]kI?`  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 (=CV")tF  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 $f_;>f2N  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 WfhQi;r  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 /_xwHiA  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 {ogGi/8  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 r|fJ~0z  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 pJ6bX4QnDX  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 2!~ j(_TA  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 QVL92"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 702&E(rx,  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 ul(1)q^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 8 fVI33  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 LZ|G"5X[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 KAjKv_6=g  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 tU!"CX  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 @0A0\2  
    wS%I.  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 B:n9*<v(  
    jsf=S{^2  
    Nominal     0.54403234 <& 8cq@<  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 @_FL,AC&m  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 A_{QY&%m  
    Mean        0.35770970 D(~6h,=m  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 / ]>&OSV  
    r@e_cD] M  
    G( nT.\  
    Compensator Statistics: x|U]x  
    Change in back focus: n~8-+$6OR  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 \$VtwVQ,b  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 {3$ge  
    Mean               :         0.161872 d{9rEB?  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 lR{eO~'~V  
    3`n5[RV  
    90% >       0.20977951               '@AK0No\W  
    80% >       0.22748071               }dAb} 0XK.  
    50% >       0.38667627               :&2RV_$>=  
    20% >       0.46553746               e l'^9K  
    10% >       0.50064115                Dd!MG'%hlb  
    z/F(z*'v  
    End of Run. (vz)GrH>  
    [@rZ.Hsl  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 '|J-8"  
    A8e b{qv  
    t<|=-  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 ?.v!RdM+  
    $*xnq%A  
    不吝赐教
    本主题包含附件,请 登录 后查看, 或者 注册 成为会员
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 z;#}u C  
    80% >       0.22748071                 I y8gQdI  
    50% >       0.38667627                 C(?>l.QGw  
    20% >       0.46553746                 p|(910OEQ  
    10% >       0.50064115 `r_qvrC  
    T"kaOy  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? !ye%A&  
    ;L(W'+  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   P:(,l,}F8  
    /y@$|DI1  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : )"t=sFxaB  
    90% >       0.20977951                 wC@4`h\U  
    80% >       0.22748071                 c{|soc[#  
    50% >       0.38667627                 ^L]+e  
    20% >       0.46553746                 F~W*"i+EZ  
    10% >       0.50064115 a(d'iAU8^  
    ....... H'?Bx>X  
    Sh2q#7hf  
     fJc,KZy  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   7 &GhJ^Ku  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 6$fC R  
    Sampling            : 2 ` mALx! `  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 +vDT^|2SF  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 #\%Gr tM  
    FE/&<g0,:  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? .N/4+[2p(  
    5jx{O${u  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试