切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 18359阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 vMzR3@4e  
    miuJ!Kr'  
    ]WN{8   
    zN].W\("\  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 tFwQ /  
    ex'd^y  
    < t>N(e  
    L]9!-E  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: 5Ag]1k{  
    '0H +2  
    Analysis of Tolerances oVoTnGNM6  
    |1g2\5Re  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX jA=uK6m  
    Title: ]!YzbvoR  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 :b=`sUn<X+  
    m f4@g05  
    Units are Millimeters. J9/9k  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. ]_d(YHYf  
    kC|tv{g#>  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. K_]LK  
    Ip8 Ap$  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. &_" 3~:N8k  
    l#:=zu  
    Mnemonics: X%`8h _  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. WRVKh  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. :U ?P~HI  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. wH|\;M{0V1  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. AKa{C f  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). e6s L N  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). 4$IPz7  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). 2(\>PN-  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. .vG6\U7  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. +]uy  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. jf/;`br  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). gQ?>%t]  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). px4Z  
    WNm,r>6m  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. 2Q9s?C   
    EHzU`('?[  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. F{l,Tl"Jw  
    }{iR+M X  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm /^#} \<;  
    Mode                : Sensitivities R0. `2=  
    Sampling            : 2 ,wX/cUyZ  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 t$\]6RU  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 ?)]sfJG  
    IH>+P]+3"3  
    4`Fbl]Q   
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees j:<E=[Kl  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY diTzolY7  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 `awk@  
    j1/J9F'  
    Sensitivity Analysis: :&_@U$  
    CZ]+B8Pl(x  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------|  |2n2  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change uO"@YX/  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 Nkv2?o>l  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 nHZ 4):`  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 {jk {K6 }  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 dZnq 96<:|  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 0CTI=<;  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 X-n'?=  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 z#,?*v  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 o &Nr5S  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 jRgv 8n  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 1 #EmZ{*  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 , / 4}CM  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 D.?KgOZ  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 60`y=!?f  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 tM@TT@.t~  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 oO= 6Kd+T  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 N18Zsdrp  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 C}+(L3Z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Dhef|E<  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 VaQ}XM  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ;| \Ojuf  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ;Vp&f%u+v  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) Kx<bVK4"  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 y#x]?%m  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (F_#LeJ|  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) *a$z!Ma3h  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 2RM0ca _F  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Mb$&~!  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 hV=)T^Q  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 66z1_ lA  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000  p&ZD1qa  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 2Db[dk( ]  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 6J&L5E  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 a nIdCOh  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 I.(/j  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 _-^ KqNyy  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 4; &(  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 bNc=}^  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 vk[Km[(U'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 RJd55+h  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 ZEApE+m  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 fmloh1{4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 N %0F[sY6  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 N$_Rzh"9rr  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 x:?1fvVR  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ,T1 t`  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 O<o_MZN  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 e#16,a-}o  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 m3,]j\  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 Kb4u)~S:  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 =_v_#;h&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 uWMAXGL  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 >gVR5o  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 #M8"b]oh6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 hEEbH@b  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 .\1XR  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 ^*Rrx  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ea7v:#O[S  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 0~^opNR  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 V-I_SvWv\  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5N ' QG<jE  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 zXMIDrq  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 m2VF}% EIr  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 IURi90Ir  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes rF 7EO%,  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 N5oao'7|A  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 u^V`Ucd"R  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes Y+WOU._46I  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 Vh'H5v^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 HM--`RJ  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes YMJjO0  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 ,=z8aiUu  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 i}M&1E  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 3QGg;  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 3pq&TYQU  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 n;!t?jnf.  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 P3@[x  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 QbS w<V  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 | F: ?  
    Xt9?7J#\T  
    Worst offenders: eK3J9 ;X  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change [}d 3 u!  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 +mV4Ty  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ggX'`bK  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 L42C<  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 SAXjB;VH6  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 rWSw1(sAA  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 U2+CL)al^  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 [)9bR1wh  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 nvpdu)q<  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 d<: VoQM6M  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 0$* z   
    %n!s{5:F  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: }%_x T  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 O^oFH OpFh  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 g4%x7#vz0  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 ;>|:I(l;  
    9k2HP]8=[{  
    Compensator Statistics: d) G7U$z~  
    Change in back focus: o_os;  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 vNi7=3  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 UHweV:(|T  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 8|V6RgA%  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 PX(Gx%s|  
    h^34{pKDn  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: Qh)@-r3  
    Number of trials: 20 ].2q.7Yur  
    s`GSc)AI  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution Alh%Z\  
    +<@7x16  
      Trial       Criterion        Change 7P!/jaw xb  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 `h :&H,N  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 (!{_O_&  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 1 dI  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 w doA>a?q  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 pk(<],0]X  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 QQ1+uY  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 56&s'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 HIi"zo=V  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 '_@=9 \<  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 d/Fjs0pt  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 A CJmy2  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 QBY7ZT05Gt  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 ObMsncn  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 t3v*P6  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 `Z]a6@w~  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 xg\M9&J  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 k`2 K?9\  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 EmG`ga)s  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 m7^a4  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 E^#|1Kpq  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 r/:s2 oQ  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 J'^BxN&  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 !W]># Pm  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 3 +BPqhzf  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 9j$ OU@N 8  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 (!DH'2I[  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744  CG$S?  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 ?GB($D=Y'&  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 _(J- MCY\  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 DT n=WGm)  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 ^=E4~22q  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 *Rr,ii  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 %v : a  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 }+i ZY\t  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 "`C|;\w  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 H ,KU!1p  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 i LK8Wnrq  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 N, ;'oL+  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 "p2 $R*ie  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 k$k (g  
    )0fQ(3oOg  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 k[y{&f,  
    -H'_%~OV(  
    Nominal     0.54403234 wC'KI8-  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 J Y %B:  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 7b:oz3?PI  
    Mean        0.35770970 L.l%EcW=,  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 #e+%;5\  
    ~=Er= 0  
    u)R>ozER  
    Compensator Statistics: NVeb,Pf  
    Change in back focus: I)_072^O  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 vlp]!7v  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 .eK1xwhJ  
    Mean               :         0.161872 #x)G2T'?  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 `Ft`8=(  
    ) 8st  
    90% >       0.20977951               \C/`?"4w  
    80% >       0.22748071               e%(zjCA  
    50% >       0.38667627               :v1'(A1t  
    20% >       0.46553746               nU)}!` E  
    10% >       0.50064115                D#W{:_f  
    V\ !FD5%  
    End of Run. <)?H98S  
    ?n\~&n'C  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 .Z'CqBr[:  
    }@!d(U*  
    q6\z]8)  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 (@uQ>dR:  
    )&se/x+  
    不吝赐教
    本主题包含附件,请 登录 后查看, 或者 注册 成为会员
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 xfos>|0N  
    80% >       0.22748071                 ;G;vpl  
    50% >       0.38667627                 e_\4(4x  
    20% >       0.46553746                 vb5tyY0c  
    10% >       0.50064115 MfCu\[qOz  
    lv&<kYWY  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? qB<D'h7  
    9)aXLM4Y  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???    6.KR(V  
    ? Yy[8_(tN  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : #N[nvIi}  
    90% >       0.20977951                 pWO,yxr:  
    80% >       0.22748071                 E`u=$~K  
    50% >       0.38667627                 .!l#z|/x  
    20% >       0.46553746                 2Z\6xb|u  
    10% >       0.50064115 5?kF'yksR  
    ....... "_}Hzpy5k  
    V78QV3  
    C8-4 m68"  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   n;xtUw6 \  
    Mode                : Sensitivities XB50>??NE  
    Sampling            : 2 2%rAf8=  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 6wqq"6w  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 q/XZb@rt  
    Nye Ga  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? ,}=x8Xxr  
    kC!7<%(  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    963
    光币
    1091
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1911
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试