切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15541阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1063
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 ^|(LAjet  
    9T9!kb  
    UnV.~u~  
     A,<E\  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 7U"g3 a)=  
    O+]ZyHnB  
    _8J.fT$${  
    ((;!<5-`s  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: -f^tE,-  
    q~o<*W   
    Analysis of Tolerances $( kF#  
    /Iokf@5  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX & h)yro  
    Title: "Gzz4D  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 v{N`.~,^  
    *OsQ}onv  
    Units are Millimeters. Y\P8 v  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. AeM^73t  
    |aS.a&vwR  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. U9 s&  
    xm~`7~nFR  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. 3jU&zw9  
    bsli0FJSh'  
    Mnemonics: o5PO =AN  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. eC4[AX6e  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. lrE5^;/s1  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. J yK3{wYS  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. Of#u  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). gz9j&W.  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). !9e=_mY  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). T&bY a`f]  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. | YWD8 +  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. ^z*t%<@[Q  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. Dx?,=~W9  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). n( yn<  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). Nh|uO?&C6  
    uH^-R_tQ  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. &r /Mi%  
    eo?bL$A[s  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. c)85=T6*aA  
    >]TWXmx/w  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm 2]*OQb#O6e  
    Mode                : Sensitivities ADzhNf S  
    Sampling            : 2 ]%H`_8<gc  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 >+1duAC  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 U7F!Z( 9  
    h438`  
    h[Y1?ln&h  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees vvMT}-!  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY (w3YvG.  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 3nQ`]5.Q w  
    p6V0`5@t  
    Sensitivity Analysis: g3y~bf  
    W ac&b  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| _B<X`L =  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change J ZS:MFA  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 \R_C&=  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 _`T_">9r  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000  =:pJ  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 6cXyJW  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 Jnov<+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Q1 97mN+0  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 Y:[u1~a  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 ~$^XP.a.  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 L="}E rmK  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 <bWG!ZG  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 ~f98#43  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #\m<Sz5Gp#  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 )y$(AJx$  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 VTE .^EK!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 Fx.=#bVX7  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 5 7c8xk[.2  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 4tBYR9|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 :vbW  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 e\L8oOk#r  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 f-Z/t fC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 .ioEI sg  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) rx|pOz,:  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 %'pgGC"|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 rey!{3U  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) evmeqQG=  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 > ~O.@|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1yhDrpm  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 <LiPEo.R  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671  @q) d  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (sZ"iGn%  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 3Y$GsN4ln  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 SmO~,2=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 J|73.&B  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 T>W,'H  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 S f# R0SA  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 abVmkdP_s  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 f/?P514h  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 H Pz+Dm  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 !4+<<(B=E  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 dR]m8mdqc1  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 v]UwJz3<  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 CqC`8fD1  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 ]`WJOx4  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 QMm%@zH  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ;O,jUiQ  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 %WS+(0*1  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 @H8EWTZ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 dWBA1p  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 GM<9p_ B  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 jPkn[W# 6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 <#4h}_xA%  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 >H ,*H;6  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 +=)+'q]S  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 YS_; OFsd  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 &K,i f  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195  Vxt+]5X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Z;"vW!%d  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 .=; ;  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 (/] J3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 K*dCc}:`  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 <1!O1ab  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 klhtKp_p  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Y_P!B^z3  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes `Q,H|hp;k;  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 a8Wwq?@  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 f*8DCh!r"  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes % & bY]w  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 3G4-^hY<  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 TD_Oo-+\  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes OZ;*JR:  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 93hxSRw  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 PPsE${!  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 poFg 1  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 Ek}A]zC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 e96k{C`j0  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 5@W j>:w  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 +"VP-s0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 ovV'VcUs  
    +ck}l2&#  
    Worst offenders: Gs[XJ 5%`~  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change |Q>IrT  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 1BEHw?dLU  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 vvOV2n .WD  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 e>7i_4(C  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Z/J y'$x  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 &+R?_Ooibk  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Aiea\j Bv  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 L/^I*p,  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ct}9i"H#1  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 Y6d@h? ht  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 !f6(Zho  
    40 0#v|b  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: sx<%2  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 n'w.; q  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 .%QXzIa3F  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 _J[P[(ab  
    B7vpsSL  
    Compensator Statistics:  8dyg1F  
    Change in back focus: @\I#^X5lv  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 FxtI"g\0  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 5/z/>D;  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 TuqH*{NNy9  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 G*v,GR  
    Wo ,?+I  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: 8HdAFRw  
    Number of trials: 20 E1f\%!2l  
    dC4'{ n|7  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution Ecx<OTo  
    >-{Hyx  
      Trial       Criterion        Change @xZR9Z8]L  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 B?o7e<l[  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 q"_QQ~  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 61 ~upQaR  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 OK g qT!  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 jlg(drTo  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 1@=po)Hnp  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 4nz35BLr  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 o%*xvH*A  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 tFl"n;~T  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 sUm'  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 #LN`X8Wz'  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 j 1HW._G  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 Nl1D o:PY  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 9Lfv^V0  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 e(8Ba X _  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 FNId ;  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 mlS$>O_aX  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 G<;*SYAb  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 PE5G  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 VOh4#%Vj  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 qb` \)X]9  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 cPc</[x[W  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 5QO9Q]I#_\  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 b\+`e b8_  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 ##4HYQ%E  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 !FFU=f  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 7i1q wRv  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 t@+}8^ M  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 $]2vvr  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 r-/`"j{O!  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 ^L&iR0  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 MR.'t9m2L  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 *s iFj CN<  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 N=g"(%  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 S?BG_J6A7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 [;myHI`tw  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 t.\dpBq  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 U\!X,a*ts{  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 =zs`#-^8  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 }f7j 8py  
    6/dI6C!  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 DkAAV9*  
    t#eTV@-  
    Nominal     0.54403234 )TM4R)r%)9  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 QUQ'3  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 "`1bA"E  
    Mean        0.35770970 y Fq&8 x<X  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 WvZ8/T'x  
    ^&Y#)II  
    ?p8_AL'RS  
    Compensator Statistics: gt w Q-  
    Change in back focus: ,U dVNA  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 WQO) =n  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 K8Y=S12Ti  
    Mean               :         0.161872 x `)&J B  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 SGlNKA},A  
    7EO_5/cY  
    90% >       0.20977951               l_%6  
    80% >       0.22748071               @cB$iP=Z4  
    50% >       0.38667627               %vi<Ase g  
    20% >       0.46553746               hp L;bM'  
    10% >       0.50064115                zjoq6  
    \=0Vi6!Mc  
    End of Run. Rr|VD@%  
    *$ %a:q1U  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 0v$~90)  
    x0:m-C  
    h>OfOx/{q9  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 ~zNAbaC+>t  
    N^:9Fz  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1063
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1063
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 )iK6:s #  
    80% >       0.22748071                 Lrq .Ab#  
    50% >       0.38667627                 v9O~@v{=  
    20% >       0.46553746                 _&ks1cw  
    10% >       0.50064115 ^V Zk+'4  
    HYSIN^<oy  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? oJ|j#+Ft  
    ;)^`3`  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   { W{]L:  
    Ob&<]  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1063
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : 8xV9.4S  
    90% >       0.20977951                 QoIT*!  
    80% >       0.22748071                 mA+&Io  
    50% >       0.38667627                 ,\  
    20% >       0.46553746                 *%fi/bimG  
    10% >       0.50064115 ?Unb? {,&2  
    ....... Y^7$t^&  
    =JbRu|/  
    lG!|{z7+0  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   mdmvT~`  
    Mode                : Sensitivities A3no~)wZn  
    Sampling            : 2 NI#:|}CYS  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 [los dnH^?  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 K/b_22]CC  
    5eoska#y   
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1063
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? 0]=i}wL 8  
    OK6] e3UO  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1063
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试