切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19982阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview Rm^3K   
    qK_jgj=w  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability MBeubS  
    v- 793pr  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools dF@m4U@L  
    8>\tD  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses #N?VbDK9_  
    hDn?R}^l{  
    User Interface {5GXN!f  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only -z s5WaJn/  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 0*=[1tdWY  
    bfE4.YF  
    Modeling !R`E+G@   
    Most elements cannot be edited sz"N,-<Ig  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) IBT 1If3  
    No unboolean capability u~]O #v  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time eYpK!9  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Rj'Tu0l  
    TJO?BX_9  
    Ray Trace '{ $7Dbo  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace b] 5i`  
    No point sources; no volume sources ?LwBF;Y  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) Sc.@u3  
    "hbCP4  
    Analysis ;%ng])w=;  
    No illumination error estimate wni^qs.i@3  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 1(diG&  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres 2+oS'nL  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro Ai*+LSG  
    Y(/y,bJ?jp  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro uBUT84i  
    Interactive ray trace O' ~>AC5{  
    Editable geometry 0 3?7kAI  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) MwHxn%  
    i6Fvi Zx  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented tt03 gU`  
    3D textures \hO}3;*&  
    Source definition GQ8A}gwH  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist V2B: DIpr  
    iGw\A!}w\  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition p;<aZ&@O  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ~j36(`t  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 68()2v4X  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities m4@Lml+B,  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) w\}Q.$@  
    Yc-gJI*1  
    TracePro features not in LT n48%Uwa,  
    Ray trace through GRIN material 8=,?B h".  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Fvr$K*u  
    KN:V:8:J  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT 4vMjVbr  
    jyFKO[s\X  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT *Xk gwJq  
    5gZ *  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) ja%IGaH;s  
    3Lm7{s?=Z-  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT V5!mV_EoR@  
    (L,>P`CR6  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) a\xf\$Ym  
    yaK4% k  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP =p \eh?^  
    Gxw>.O){  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons w^)_Fk3  
    -"x25~k!?F  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP xF`O ehVA  
    c{\x< AwO  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software B18?)LA  
    Df}3^J~JX  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools +5ue) `  
    x}jiHV@=  
    gFw- P#t  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 #QKgY7  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented %VGQ{:  
    0r%,|FaS  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 ]MRQcqbpqL  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 %s#`Z [8,  
        5`f\[oA  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!