切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19678阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview AU^Wy|i5Q  
    ` eND3c  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability S4qh8c  
    bjm`u3 A  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ,RCjfX a  
    Kp ~k!6x  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses {)4Vv`n  
    ])m",8d&T  
    User Interface .7ahz8v  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only kgr:8 5  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous Pk8L- [&v  
    ,=$yvZs4[]  
    Modeling :e+GtN?  
    Most elements cannot be edited <e/O"6='Z  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ]DmqhK`  
    No unboolean capability aCGPtA'  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time '3+S5p8  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses wf|CE410  
    YgM6z K~  
    Ray Trace )&_{m K  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace /3KEX{'@U  
    No point sources; no volume sources ]\#RsVX  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) }ZVNDvGH  
    De>pIN;B>  
    Analysis Q96g7[  
    No illumination error estimate yt!K|g  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” (a^F`#]  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres |I OTW=>  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro c$e~O-OVD?  
    KJ9~"v  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro .zegG=q  
    Interactive ray trace kQ'G+Kw~F  
    Editable geometry }DZkCzK  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) YLFTf1G9  
    HH+rib'u  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented ^eZqsd8a  
    3D textures 8i:b~y0  
    Source definition "UA W  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist 7gJy xQ  
    SR43#!99Q  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition 7XwFO0==  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface w6wXe_N+M  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) *{-XN  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities F'*{Fk h  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) aqyXxJS8  
    lT(MywNsg  
    TracePro features not in LT  MT&i5!Z  
    Ray trace through GRIN material eA+6-'qN  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP T %cN(0 @  
    c^=,@#  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT ml3]CcKn  
    9^aMmN&6N2  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT 1$ l3-x  
    C"F(kgL  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) s+(8KYTs`  
    -bs~{  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT U,+=>ns>  
    )P,jpE8  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ~5JXY5 *o  
    N:d" {k  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP icnp^2P  
    Uh9$e  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons >Ks|yNJ  
    mT)iN`$Y@  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP M~wJe@bc  
    yuhSP{pv'  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software Z$+0gm\Cnw  
    paiF ah  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools OHH wcJ7N  
    [S*bN!t  
    QPdhesrd-  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 a[t2T jB  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented zf6k%  
    b^FB[tZ\x  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 CFn!P;.!  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 p+A#t~K  
        $0{c =r9  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!