切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19602阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview SUMfebW5  
    uIO,9> ee  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability 2INpo  
    :KX*j$5U  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools *#}=>, v  
    9H4"=!AAgD  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Y]`=cR`/"  
    -YQS\@?  
    User Interface ?_AX;z  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only } #e=*8F7  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous V(ww F  
    v mkiw1  
    Modeling "OI$PLK  
    Most elements cannot be edited 2RNee@!JJP  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 2Q@n a @s  
    No unboolean capability [O_5`X9|  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time a9NuYYr,h  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses C,> n  
    <`vXyPA6  
    Ray Trace D Q={  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace xu-bn  
    No point sources; no volume sources x{w|Hy  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) "u~` ZV(  
    *(r9c(xa  
    Analysis Y+23 jlgb  
    No illumination error estimate #| g h  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” mGDc,C=5:  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Kzq^f=p  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro & }j;SK5  
    Ex_dqko  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro 'M?ptu?f  
    Interactive ray trace 'NjeF&#6  
    Editable geometry 5GJkvZtFY  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) l> H'PP~  
    ckP AH E@  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented SbL7e#!!  
    3D textures &*O'qOO<2  
    Source definition M9Sj@ww  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist ESIJ QM-[+  
    IR2Qc6+{  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition TZ n2,N  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ^e]O >CJ  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) wS7Vo{#@\  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities tNZZCdB  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) c(8>oeKyD  
    X[w]aJnAr  
    TracePro features not in LT _N|A I"sj.  
    Ray trace through GRIN material J]S6%omp>  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP ' MyJw*%b]  
     1v3  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT X>yE<ni  
    zh?B-"O=5  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT qnd] UUA^  
    l)DcwkIG  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) I~"l9Jc!"  
    Ym -U{a  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT BjjuZN&  
    /K+;HAUTn  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) 4>Q] \\Lc  
     ]5ibg"{S  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP ^Nav8dma  
    B<@a&QBTg  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons >A6PH*x  
    QqeF   
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP % 1<@p%y/  
    6is+\  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software OWYY2&.h  
    b4ke'gx  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools eo"XHP7ja  
    '@QK<!%,  
    EScy!p\*  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 yN#]Q}4  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented hH?ke(&=f  
    ^#7&R"  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 d _=44( -  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 PCKxo;bD  
        f+c{<fX  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!