切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20205阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 'S>Jps@  
    xrd ^vE  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability =,9'O/br  
    o?\Pw9Y  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools fQ) ;+  
     yFv3>\  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 4Yk (ldR~  
    CdjGYS  
    User Interface cQb%bmBc5  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only /GNYv*  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous zc5_;!t  
    =0|evC  
    Modeling G3n7x?4m  
    Most elements cannot be edited ggWfk  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) Vh&KfYY  
    No unboolean capability /vKDlCH*  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time *a4eL [  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses wXnt3)e  
    fq'Of wT  
    Ray Trace !h~\YE)  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace jrR~V* :k  
    No point sources; no volume sources R _%pR_\  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 3& $E  
    ~gD'up@$/  
    Analysis AseY.0  
    No illumination error estimate .[! ^ L  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” z m%\L/BF  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres W\ckt]'  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro YH9BJ  
    j(rFORT  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro /(w5S',EL  
    Interactive ray trace ()Z$j,2  
    Editable geometry w~`P\i@  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) Yp8$0KK  
    Wil +"[Ge  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented ,~!lNyL  
    3D textures rBL)ct  
    Source definition h?b{{  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist :MpCj<<[  
    l[x wH 9'  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition 7Vi[I< *  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface .*Z]0~ &|  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) B0:O]Ax6.^  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities $_ y"P  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) \,WPFV  
    Je/R'QP^8  
    TracePro features not in LT })":F  
    Ray trace through GRIN material 9Ah4N2nL-b  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP ^^v!..V]J  
    Ne=D $o  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT -6? 5|\  
    oyUf/ Sl  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT M*x_1h5n  
    nPKj%g3h  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 76 y}1aa  
    -kJ`gdS  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT NTV0DkX  
    az w8BK  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) +2vcUy  
    X0m\   
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP /h_BF\VBs  
    4`i_ 4&TS  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons km *$;Nli  
    y'(;!5w  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP k}/0B  
    "Li"NxObCA  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 1:8ZS  
    C\1Dy5  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools )jn xR${M  
    &7;W=uF  
    aaLT%  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 3^8%/5$v  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented Z(Xu>ap  
    s I#K01;"  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 18F7;d N8  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004  75%!R  
        _Nw-|N.  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!