切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 18786阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview Um4$. BKD  
    2Mqac:L  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability rID_^g_tP8  
    V* :Q~ ^  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools SU. 9;I !  
    24 )Sf  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses MSef2|"P#  
    /Q|guJx  
    User Interface BbCt_z'  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only :Ng4? +@r  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous SLCV|@G  
    t,CC~  
    Modeling MXQ S6F#  
    Most elements cannot be edited A'jw;{8NpF  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) nMz~.^Q-  
    No unboolean capability Kr;7~`$[  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time +i %,+3#6  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses *{/L7])gm  
    xt{f+c@P  
    Ray Trace k{{iF  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace Stq [[S5P  
    No point sources; no volume sources Gp<7i5  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) > `uk2QdC  
    Hcts^zm2u  
    Analysis m{~p(sQL  
    No illumination error estimate #<^ngoOj  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” >Ei-Spy>Xl  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres :yLSLN  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro ^p'iX4M  
    4V$DV!dPQ}  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro EPY64 {  
    Interactive ray trace |VY+!  
    Editable geometry w Ud6xR  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) L}>XH*  
    \P3[_kbf1  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 1|+Z mo"  
    3D textures (k@%04c  
    Source definition ]#UyYgPk  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist xz @/^Cj  
    =bVaB<!  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition 5CSihw/5  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ?1r>t"e5  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) O<@S,/Q4  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities rUb`_W@  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) [Rqv49n*V  
    ,ZVC@P,L  
    TracePro features not in LT `M "O #  
    Ray trace through GRIN material LI>tN R~  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP 8P wobln  
    1gq(s2izy  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT g$qNK`y  
    \]uo^@$bm  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT yv.UNcP?  
    yq3i=RB(  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) l8"  
    piZ0KA"  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT ebbC`eFD  
    a88(,:t  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) @"`J~uK  
    K_@[%  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP (GLd" Zq  
    ^Vl{IsY  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons hpftVEB  
    L-7?:  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP =.@{ uu;  
    vT*z3  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software eOZ0L1JM!  
    /cPe zX  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools !/+'O}@-E  
    !J3dlUFRO  
    efj[7K.h  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 wS*An4%G  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented |sf&t  
    -)biSU,  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 -L;sv0  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 5PY,}1`  
        w8!S;~xKI  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!