切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19988阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 8193d%Wb  
    5PpS/I:on  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability iY sQ:3s  
    +]H!q W:  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools brCL"g|}  
    Ve"M8-{oKk  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses >v/%R~BuX  
    _*t75e$-  
    User Interface 1)-VlQK p  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only lj *=bK  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous U'}[:h~)  
     `7V'A  
    Modeling b|.<rV'BTt  
    Most elements cannot be edited Fdx4jc13w  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) E,A9+OKxJ  
    No unboolean capability /EVXkf0  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time Gx%f&H~Z^  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses g`H;~ w  
    6?l|MU"Q.  
    Ray Trace 4+N9Ylh  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace }Szs9-Wns  
    No point sources; no volume sources 5e c T.  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) i uoZk5O  
    )KN]"<jB  
    Analysis J~5+=V7OV  
    No illumination error estimate t,yMO  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” TmgSV#G  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres $&0\BvS  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro }Ld eU:E4  
    x@,B))WlGr  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro Nvj KB)J  
    Interactive ray trace oJor ]QYK  
    Editable geometry M[5fNK&nD  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) [O^mG 9  
    6vebGf  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 9':MD0P/M  
    3D textures qM0Df0$?x  
    Source definition !wEz= i  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist J nf@u  
    J={IGA  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition 2W vf[2Xw  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface "}jv5j5  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) Xmaj7*f>p  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities R7~#7qKQB  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) guWX$C-+1  
    |;(0]  
    TracePro features not in LT b0!ZA/YC-  
    Ray trace through GRIN material kESnlmy@J  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP BP`'1Ns  
    m03]SF(#3  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT Or*e$uMIY  
    H_<hZ UB  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT S, %BhQ[  
    NM:\T1  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) I-?Dil3  
    [W{WfJ-HwG  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT VwxLElV  
    oD>j2 6Q  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) J_ S]jE{  
    Y] "_}  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP =& .KKr  
    SByn u  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons h<8.0  
    q V +gQ  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP p2Fff4nQ   
    V<%eWT)x7C  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 4$^\s5K  
    2y0J~P!I  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools yK3b^  
    ZgP~VB0)$  
    %Ct^{k~1  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 (-:lO{@FsC  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented +Kz baBK  
    { #,eD  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 p]-\\o}  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 AJ0 ;wx  
        ;`f14Fb  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!