切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 21097阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview *UVjN_na5  
    FI@2K M  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability BcV;EEi  
    n =v4m_e  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools  |u 8hxa  
    G3QB Rh{  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses <x@\3{{U  
    }{/4sll  
    User Interface z79L2lJn  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only p}uT qI  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous Y1AbG1n|  
    b><jhbv  
    Modeling @t`| w.]ml  
    Most elements cannot be edited z.23i^Q  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) @%J?[PG  
    No unboolean capability 9m 56oT'U{  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time [ d<|Cde  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Fy-nV% P  
    S|;a=K&hS  
    Ray Trace ;3\F b3d  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace g2C-)*'{yh  
    No point sources; no volume sources tZ>>aiI3  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) l>"gO9j  
    hX)r%v:  
    Analysis LYh5f#  
    No illumination error estimate =B1t ?( "  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 5`oor86  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Fhn883  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro F)e*w:D  
    &:]_a?|*S  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro oZ6xHdPc4  
    Interactive ray trace pRc(>P3;  
    Editable geometry 6z%3l7#7Yi  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) r_)-NOp  
    mm#U a/~1u  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 9][Mw[k>  
    3D textures 8f^URN<x  
    Source definition i04Sf^  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist (-dJ0!  
    h:bs/q+-  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition fil6w</L  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface Arp4$h  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) DA@ { d-A  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities 8QC:ro  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) W]Ph:O ^5c  
    AU'{aC+p  
    TracePro features not in LT L6 _Sc-sU  
    Ray trace through GRIN material T82=R@7  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP &OzJ^G\o  
    Jb tbW &EH  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT aO<d`DTyJ  
    wkm SIN:  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT ~Q%QA._R?  
    D3^v[>E2  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) xq~=T:>/A  
    1}ToR=  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT W\KZFrV@  
    [6|8Gx :  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) v#/,,)m  
    ?1412Tq5  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP ,~4(td+R7  
    aPb!-o{  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons U NAuF8>K  
    ^al SyJ`  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP &WRoNc  
    eb8_guZ  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software TX+t   
    "1nd~ BBOw  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools SwL\=nq+~  
    s`TBz8QO$  
    2>r.[  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 nbRg<@  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented >L(F{c:  
    (l^lS=x  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 @]7\.>)  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 ejQCMG7  
        s1FBz)yCY=  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!