切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19519阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 2>9C-VL2  
    KM0ru  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability jwe*(k]z  
    qx(xvU9  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ~G p [_ %K  
    B4/>H|  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses YMyfL8bO  
    KkyVSoD\  
    User Interface tFn)aa~L  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only (#c*M?g3  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous s+Pq&<nV-  
    F;EwQjTF  
    Modeling ,,.QfUj/&  
    Most elements cannot be edited ;+_:,_  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 5~U/   
    No unboolean capability Kn{4;Xk\  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time u#fM_>ML  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ?<,l3pwqa  
    }K>d+6qk5  
    Ray Trace %0?KMRr  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace AN m d!  
    No point sources; no volume sources i"FtcP^  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) K3m/(jdO  
    aKDKmHd  
    Analysis B@))8.h]  
    No illumination error estimate rHI{aO7  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” uMv,zO5  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres 4@gG<QJW  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro #%2rP'He  
     }v{LRRi  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro MchA{p&Ol  
    Interactive ray trace YP<ms  
    Editable geometry ^DLfY-F+j  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) |-ALklXr  
    e%M;?0j  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented d1T!+I  
    3D textures ,qwuLBW  
    Source definition R\f+SvE  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist %;' s4ly  
    29b9`NXt  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition 9FR5Jw>t  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface gJ{)-\  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 6MW{,N  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities ajT*/L!0_  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) kTB 0b*V  
    0+ '&`Q!u  
    TracePro features not in LT T-L||yE,h  
    Ray trace through GRIN material .<FH>NW)  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP '<<t]kK[N  
    "S]TP$O D  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT p l0\2e)  
    xCTML!H  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT BU_nh+dF  
    d0ks G$  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 59A}}.@?m  
    cT,sh~-x,  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT p2](_}PK  
    ki!0^t:9  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ~ 7s!VR  
    kevrsV]/$  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP 4VSU8tK|N]  
    \b x$i*  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons cwg"c4V  
    Q2gq}c~  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP bn5 Su=]  
    :I#V.  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software :F?C)F  
    Lf&kv7Wj  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools (9a^$C*  
    ZECfR>`x  
    1qA;/-Zr<o  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 UK!(G  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented <P_-s*b  
    JZ x[W&]zT  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 bt?5*ETA  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 x q h  
        F^:3?JA _  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!