切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19685阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview mQbpv'N  
    QbN7sg~~  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability _v[yY3=3  
     L+=pEk_  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools >}uDQwX8  
    hJ)\Vo  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses @nh* H{  
    MV(Sb:RZ  
    User Interface x5X;^.1Fr  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Np.] W(  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous sy\w ^]  
    _EusY3q  
    Modeling 'j#J1 xwJ  
    Most elements cannot be edited 8et*q3D7`  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ,/bSa/x`  
    No unboolean capability zXEu3h  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time ]Qu.-F#g  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 2#XYR>[  
    6m\MYay  
    Ray Trace H[x$65ND  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace )-u0n] ,  
    No point sources; no volume sources yu~o9  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 2~wIHtd  
    'g@Yra&09  
    Analysis ~vGX(8N  
    No illumination error estimate S>6f0\F/Y%  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 82>90e(CH]  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres +n>_NVe  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro nF)XZB 0F  
    f)b+>!  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro -,Oq=w*EV  
    Interactive ray trace 70MSP;^  
    Editable geometry }j_2K1NS{  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) G%q^8#  
    j} .,|7X  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented zT< P_l  
    3D textures kLfk2A;'i  
    Source definition YTk"'q-  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist 937 z*mh  
    ER'zjI>t@  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition >%?kp[  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface h@H8oZ[  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) &%\H170S  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities <=g{E-  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04)  L#>^R   
    )zK6>-KWA  
    TracePro features not in LT i*\\j1mf  
    Ray trace through GRIN material ;J&p17~T9  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP _Xe" +  
    W-8U~*/  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT !*1Kjg3  
    z=[?&X]O9b  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT M. o}?  
    a^xt9o`  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) ,Qb(uirl]  
    PZ[hH(EX  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT .gP}/dj  
    ri?k}XnhX  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) eJ"je@vvrK  
    v\}s(X(J  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP xro%AM  
    ,VYUQE>\  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons "IuHSjP  
    ~C31=\$  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP Zjq(]y  
    g=)OcTd#  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software TO5#iiM)  
    ?igA+(.  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools 9%& =n  
    $)v`roDD.  
    {Q~HMe`,  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 jM5w<T-2/  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented IZSJ+KO  
    \ 3XG8J  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 W20H4!G  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 CY</v,\:#  
        {^*K@c  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!