切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19604阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 0;)4.*t  
    t1D6#JP(a  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability Ug/b;( dJ'  
    6z~6o0s~  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools P#iBwmwN+.  
    ^W;\faG  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses $)6y:t"  
    Gq?JMq#  
    User Interface ttgb"Wb%S  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only 9[T}cN=|  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous |%Pd*yZA  
    [8[g_  
    Modeling ;~F&b:CyG  
    Most elements cannot be edited !2=< MO  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) eX>x +]l6  
    No unboolean capability 4 1q|R[js!  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time it \3-  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses +K{J* n  
    B^nE^"b  
    Ray Trace vL}e1V:  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 5Sl vCL  
    No point sources; no volume sources  b"iPuN!p  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) ^zn&"@  
    E+)3n[G  
    Analysis MfQ 9d9  
    No illumination error estimate 3RJsH :u8  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” vnc- W3N  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres MfNsor  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro FLUvFD  
    ma TQ 0GX  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro zi%Ql|zI~  
    Interactive ray trace TMJq-u51  
    Editable geometry e|> 5 R  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) 5v5)vv.kd  
    Sq:,6bcG  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 5Q7Z$A1a 9  
    3D textures [3D*DyQt  
    Source definition M47t(9krV  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist ?mwa6]  
    u4x>gRz)  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition WF] |-)vw  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface t03X/%H  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) BD ,J4xH;  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities 9$f%  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) ij5|P4Eka  
    Dr K@y8  
    TracePro features not in LT CFXr=.yz  
    Ray trace through GRIN material ;&c9!LfP  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP qr4.s$VGs*  
    =&Z#QD"vl  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT i&^]qL|J  
    ~^bf1W[  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT fG zx;<0P!  
    !?)aZ |r  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) i^@hn>s$  
    *b7evU *1  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT m<sCRWa-  
    } _=h]|6t  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ra;:  
    <!=:{&d%  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP BdB9M8fM  
    068DC_  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons 4k!>JQor  
    G/ H>M%M  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP y[ZVi5) ,  
    MxOIe|=&  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software <m/XGFc  
    VIaj])m  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools m2HO .ljc  
    XMzQ8|]  
    ?rY+,nQP  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 Yfx?3  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented .pG`/[*a  
    JQ|*XU  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 j$<g8Bg=o  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 FE1'MUT_  
        =QIu3%&  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!