切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20208阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview lLv0lf  
    sM K/l @7  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability OoNAW<  
    r{_'2Z_i  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools `Ii>w b  
    '`u1,h  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses moGbBkO  
    NKRXY~zHh  
    User Interface 7>'F=}6[Y  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only t j0vB]c  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous g7pFOcV  
    F-6* BUqJ  
    Modeling V-31x)  
    Most elements cannot be edited )Jc>l;G(M  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ?g&]*zc^\  
    No unboolean capability gM8eO-d  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time m:t $&  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ` C1LR,J  
    z(xvt>  
    Ray Trace ]1K &U5p  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace ;Cwn1N9S  
    No point sources; no volume sources C9z{8 ;  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) V6L_aee}CK  
    P+/L, u  
    Analysis 5FMKJ7sC9  
    No illumination error estimate ps]6,@uyB  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” xqr`T0!&  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Fri5_rxLl  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro Hq~ 2,#Ue  
    Ub"\LUu  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro l20q(lb  
    Interactive ray trace oeIS&O.K  
    Editable geometry H\S,^)drJ?  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) `>*P(yIN  
    c]9OP9F  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented kO4C^pl"v  
    3D textures xnLfR6B  
    Source definition |oM6(px  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist QhZ%<zN  
    =}L[/RL  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition  LKm5U6  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface %H@fVWe2wT  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) :sn}D~  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities lRrOoON  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) ovHbs^H%  
    U!Lws#\X  
    TracePro features not in LT @.5Ybgn  
    Ray trace through GRIN material us]ah~U6A  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP 4uv }6&R  
    &@RU}DnvM&  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT 7fVVU+y  
    d ] [E;$  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT K)k!`du!6  
    [)a,rrhj  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) CN >q`[!  
    uIR_p \)  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT 3w-0v"j U  
     Op|Be  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) [ -%oO  
    0 cQf_o  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP ( R0   
    ,Pl[SMt!  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons SsaF><{5R  
    o~~_>V)W  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ~v5tx  
    xNx!2MrR;  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software Um|:AT}`^  
    bkY7]'.bz&  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools #)\KV7f! ;  
    C|>#|5XaF  
    3Y=S^*ztd  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 gs. K,xma  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented D3jP hPy.  
    Hv%a\WNS1  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 \zKVgywR  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 [6c{t  
        M+ H$Jjcs  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!