切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20233阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview j4?Qd0z  
    8x U*j  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability ]8\I{LR  
    R J{$`d  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools i=aR ~  
    yov~'S9  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses "l56?@-x  
     v_!6S|  
    User Interface s$R /!,c  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only  l(?B0  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous XP@dg4Z=z  
     vmqa_gU\  
    Modeling ?{S>%P A_B  
    Most elements cannot be edited KdR4<qVV}  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) N `|A  
    No unboolean capability &:&89<C'  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time e^Zm09J  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses @V%\Gspv  
    VL9wRu;  
    Ray Trace ^c\O , *:  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace }%_|k^t  
    No point sources; no volume sources NKO"'   
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 5*YoK)2J  
    ?F"o+]i+^  
    Analysis @t9HRL?T~  
    No illumination error estimate !=dz^f.{  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 3f7zW3F  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres m-AF&( ;K  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro ,{_i{WV  
    YN8x|DLi?  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro UR sx>yx  
    Interactive ray trace U#3N90,N=  
    Editable geometry axC|,8~tq  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) *()['c#CC  
    ^Oz~T|)  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 46:<[0Psl/  
    3D textures 2 *NPK}  
    Source definition tdm7MPM  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist hfwJZ\_60  
    u[GZ~L  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition hG1$YE  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface FZ- Wgh 0z  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) qezWfR`  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities CD`a-]6qA  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) xs"i_se  
    ]es|%j 2  
    TracePro features not in LT <XeDJ8 '  
    Ray trace through GRIN material k1B ](@xt  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP IL@yGuO,  
    ZdW+=;/#  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT 3qWrSziD  
    %xgP*%Sv2  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT ~>:JwTy  
    mI lg=8:  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) q`e0%^U  
    qCI&H7u@  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT iA[T'+.Y  
    <exCK*G  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) +R~]5Rxd  
    r]e{~v/  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP C >OeULD  
    !&U75FpN}:  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons BFNO yv  
    W 8<QgpV*  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP }cz58%  
    8i6iynR  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software C?. ;3 h  
    >D=X Tgqqq  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools #mH28UT  
     WDNj 7  
    !UzE&CirV  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 y1`%3\  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented 6~ET@"0uK  
    A7QT4h&6  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 ['(qeS@5O  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 d Np%=gIj  
        "4XjABJ4'  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!