切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19987阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview ekO*(vQ~  
    "AMsBvzgo  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability =/F\_/Xw  
    >`+-Yi$(\  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools X.<2]V7!  
    8rgNG7d  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses @ei:/~y3  
    OgB ZoTT  
    User Interface @X*r5hjc  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only k84JDPu#  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous &li&P5!i  
    e8<[2J)P&  
    Modeling  <IL$8a  
    Most elements cannot be edited R^F\2yth-  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) WXC}Ie  
    No unboolean capability NX4}o&mDwn  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time j=,]b6(  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Z*(lg$A9 M  
    'F@#.Op`  
    Ray Trace kGSB6  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace lj!f\C}d  
    No point sources; no volume sources .2 /$ !'E  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) * F T )`  
    [1*3 kt*h  
    Analysis p4OiCAW;  
    No illumination error estimate tgbr/eCoU  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 9 6'{ES9D  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres xPi/nWl`|  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro 8f<[Bu ze  
    B^SD5  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro ~D)!zQkD  
    Interactive ray trace ?>W4*8 (  
    Editable geometry p ft6 @ 'q  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) zU'\r~c  
    cR1dGNcp/@  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented bVc;XZwI  
    3D textures m18If  
    Source definition 9s-op:5  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist xPY/J#X$  
    I"]5B  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition Dm j^aFB0|  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ''Y}Q"  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 3 G?^/nB  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities Fs_umy#  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) _ G!lQ)1  
    -T4{PM  
    TracePro features not in LT {P_~_5o_  
    Ray trace through GRIN material nL+*-R!R  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP nBd!296  
    U n#7@8,  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT . F0V  
    kyQ%qBv ^  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT k[l+~5ix  
    )""i"/Mn  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) xQ62V11R6  
    aXyu%<@k  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT -&#L4AM%(9  
    .$DB\jJXjV  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) : z^ p s0  
    22\Buk}?  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP U A T46  
    J'4{+Q_pa  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons zh'TR$+\hO  
    /d5_-AB(v  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ^>uzMR!q5  
    =YBwO. !%  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software h)q:nlKUW  
    5j`"@C5;O  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools gh}FZs5 P  
    2GcQh]ohc  
    x;LyR  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 f3U#|(%(*  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented E$/`7p8)  
    $Vbgfp~U-  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 7|T<dfQk  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 5Ga>qIM  
        q|om^:n.  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!