切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20229阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview _B[WY  
    `%=<R-/#7S  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability 2m"_z  
    W#{la`#Bu  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 2+:'0Krc  
    Xa,\EEmQ  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 74f9|~%  
    * t!r@k  
    User Interface Y(r@v  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only wkBL=a  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous sV2iITF p  
    FN?3XNp.  
    Modeling HnU Et/  
    Most elements cannot be edited e&1 \'Zq?>  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) AVFjBybu9  
    No unboolean capability af'@h:  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time m@\ZHbq  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses wC` R>)  
    JE;+T[I  
    Ray Trace CDdkoajBa  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace Eju~}:Lo  
    No point sources; no volume sources j*3}1L4P  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 7bF*AYM  
    f/y`  
    Analysis v>m n/a  
    No illumination error estimate e:-8k_0|  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” e;ty!)]  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres cdTsRS;E  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro L1 #Ij#  
    0rE(p2  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro O#_b7i  
    Interactive ray trace YQ]\uT>}&  
    Editable geometry 'C>U=cE7  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) tju|UhP3  
    @i%YNI5*  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 1*Ar{:+ua  
    3D textures ;3m!:l  
    Source definition Q8qz*v]{  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist Of[;Qn  
    r\M9_s8  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition ]v29 Rx  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface " I+p  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) ~;#MpG;e  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities Is.WZY a  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) )TmtSSS  
    =A!S/;z>  
    TracePro features not in LT 0ejdKdYN  
    Ray trace through GRIN material O'DW5hBL0  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP W WG /k17  
    >G"X J<IO  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT *cv}*D  
    *nTU# U  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT GdmmrfXB  
    ;/8{N0  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) B]iP't \~  
    3OqX/z,  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT v3RcwySk  
    e [0w5)X   
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) kBEmmgL  
    ` %?9=h%  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP D!LX?_cD1i  
    I9y.e++/  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons S"2qJ!.u  
    &Ral+J  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ((3}LQ  
    vK'?:}~  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software +Ov2`O8?  
    C2F0tr|  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools  z01>'  
    NeOxpn[  
    I4_d[O9  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 <,%:   
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented ?pGkk=,KB  
    &*,:1=p  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 o4^Fo p  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 z4U9n'{  
        OEgI_= B  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!