切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 21092阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview Jc9@VxWY  
    ~QQEHx\4zZ  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability AiR%MD  
    d7n4zx1Hh  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 7l4InR]  
    OoA5!HEh  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses hc31+TL  
    EzeDShN=J  
    User Interface W6!4Qyn  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only dcc%G7w  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous e P,XH{s  
    A(!ZZ9 Wc  
    Modeling CzDR%vx  
    Most elements cannot be edited WEY97_@  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 3R$CxRc:  
    No unboolean capability  6@Z'fT4  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time y:|Xg0Kp  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses E+m"yQp{  
    aSj1P/A  
    Ray Trace meVVRFQ2+  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace ~RLx;  
    No point sources; no volume sources 3K20f8g  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) "6o}qeB l  
    elHarey`f  
    Analysis { `|YX_HS  
    No illumination error estimate _>)"+z^r  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” P+%)0*W  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres en#g<on  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro }(%}"%$  
    k@)m-K  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro IS*"_o<AR  
    Interactive ray trace 9X&qdA/q  
    Editable geometry 0]w[wc <  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) | xI_aYv*  
    `lh?Z3W  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented Y},GZ^zqy  
    3D textures x<7` 109]  
    Source definition 5$Q`P',*Ua  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist |Qm%G\oB?  
    ZGvNEjff  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition *!s?hHv  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface  #X_M  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) .[85<"C  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities ^S2} 0N f  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) I T2sS6&R  
    I _G;;GF  
    TracePro features not in LT p5t#d)  
    Ray trace through GRIN material I;Y`rGj  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP f#b[KB^Z,2  
    a8$pc>2E  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT /omVM u  
    (E[hl  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT <Ux;dekz}  
    v 0H#\p  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) z8MYgn 7  
    m!(K  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT 0[Aa2H*  
    (#k#0T kE  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ]uf_"D  
    +M:Q!'  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP :wm^04<i   
    x #g,l2_!  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons l?~h_8&fT  
    RZjR d  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 3ssio-X  
    oCS NA.z  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software ';%g^!lM a  
    bUNp>H>L  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools {BF\G%v;+  
    c8u0\X,  
    #3S/TBy,  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 (bw;zNW  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented .&Z Vy{uP  
    @l8?\^N  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 aj\'qRrU$  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 I'gnw~  
        Qmrcng}P  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!