切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20230阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview dcP88!#5-  
    f~iML5lG  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability oVreP  
    _KxX&THaj  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools x{j+}'9  
    Crg#6k1~EN  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses "V:XhBG?  
    $'y1 Po'2  
    User Interface n }TTq6B  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Bd QQ9$@5  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous eA10xpM0  
    [e1\A&T  
    Modeling pj j}K  
    Most elements cannot be edited ym[+Rw  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) O2$!'!hz  
    No unboolean capability dZ-Ny_@&  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time t3 K>\ :  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses F61 +n!%8  
    ~;TV74~rr  
    Ray Trace _pJX1_vD  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace W;5N04ko  
    No point sources; no volume sources Bk@bN~B4  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) rknzo]N,  
    BzN/6VEw  
    Analysis HH+TjX/b  
    No illumination error estimate ws#hhW3qK  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 7eTA`@v5A  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres w"yK\OE  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro w($XEv;  
    7l[t9ON  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro AX/=}G  
    Interactive ray trace ]eY Qio!  
    Editable geometry jc3ExOH  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) hg(KNvl  
    =#7s+d-  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented JiG8jB7%}  
    3D textures BASO$?jf4  
    Source definition M|5^':Y  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist 0]f?Dx/8  
    c`Lpqs`  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition Q&\ZC?y4  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface 89 _&X[X  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) ?14X8Mb8W_  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities EuhF$L1  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) Nj! R9N  
    bvt-leA=  
    TracePro features not in LT  ] I N -  
    Ray trace through GRIN material LA(f]Xmc  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Xmw2$MCB  
    ?,A8  fR  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT L>|A6S#y8/  
    [C*X k{e  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT \H}@-*z+)  
    ^;v.ytO*  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) ]kU~#WT  
    ^^W`Lh%9  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT hNgcE,67q  
    mo97GW  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) *;~{_Disz  
    *{L<BB^  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP #==[RNM%ap  
    4.$hHFqS^5  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons `s]zk {x  
    *HfW(C$  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP G/^5P5y%@  
    ! 7#froh  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software et7T)(k0  
    h_}BmJh_  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools R&d_ WB4w  
    :D)&>{?  
    pu m9x)y1  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 7{6cLYl  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented ~P.-3  
    pR^Y|NG!  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 jmwQc&  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 =iQ`F$M  
        DdA}A>47  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!