切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20248阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview l{%a&/  
    zj20;5o>U&  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability (cs~@  
    ]!Zty[  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools }gCHQ;U7`  
    M#M?1(O/NE  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses IVteF*8hU  
    B>|5xpZM12  
    User Interface f z%tA39m  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only oh\1>3,Ns  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous K0<yvew  
    x!?Z *v@I  
    Modeling t!jwY/T  
    Most elements cannot be edited I:t^S.,  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ;r!\-]5$  
    No unboolean capability w3bIb$12  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time ou6j*eSN  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses BXA]9eK  
    k7Oy5$##  
    Ray Trace 3bts7<K=  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace %6]\^  
    No point sources; no volume sources MPvWCPB  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) RpN <=  
    .Cr1,Po  
    Analysis Gl>E[iO  
    No illumination error estimate <E}N=J'uJ  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” C BlXC7_Mi  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres ~4^p}{  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro " $=qGHA~  
    ohplj`X[21  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro 4\1;A`2%0  
    Interactive ray trace [B,p,Q"  
    Editable geometry d h?dO`  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) w, 7Cr  
    ue9h   
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented C8MWIX}  
    3D textures WRM$DA  
    Source definition 6ZEdihBei  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist cz>mhD  
    d<v~=  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition G1p'p&x.  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface K @C4*?P  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) ?\M)WDO  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities ifHU|0_=  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) _XWnS9  
    idz9YpW  
    TracePro features not in LT Ge1duRGa  
    Ray trace through GRIN material {\Ys@FF  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP 2_.CX(kI  
    g41<8^(  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT }{t3SGsJ  
    lfgtcR{l5  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT FR(QFt!g  
     RY9. n  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) ( mt*y]p?  
    EO"6Dq(  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT cTy'JT7  
    F#KF6)P  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) GqMB^Ad  
    s"N\82z)  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP \eT/%$  
    L, #Byao  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons oo\IS\  
    ~\3l!zIq  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP wZ O@J|  
    N|o> %)R  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software Z"]xdOre  
    8M~u_`6  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools 0xLkyt0  
    aI 7Xq3  
    URk$}_39  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 VYHOk3  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented fs7~NY  
    k,A M]H  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 ^^7gDgT  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 0:jsV|5B8  
        50COL66:7  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!