切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19601阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview z_Nw%V4kr  
    k Xs&k8  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability _$W</8 <  
    JOR ? xCc  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools <])w@QOA#  
    )2U#<v^  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses A[,[j?wC  
    NwK(<dzG  
    User Interface $WOiXLyCk  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only xaiA?  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous U 0$?:C+?  
    J!%cHqR  
    Modeling Yj^| j  
    Most elements cannot be edited qU'O4TWZ  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) p'`SYEY@Z  
    No unboolean capability aYjFRH`  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time lL*k!lNs  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 6j]pJ]F6  
    'xO^2m+N;  
    Ray Trace G(alM=q  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace K%Sy~6iD&  
    No point sources; no volume sources [WOLUb  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) E57J).x-BP  
    _&/FO{F@m  
    Analysis I b)>M`J  
    No illumination error estimate ODG OWw0  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” k$V.hG|6M  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Wr\rruH6  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro !MOgM  
    Kn]c4h}@b5  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro 4{d`-reHg  
    Interactive ray trace k1A64?p  
    Editable geometry R<}Yf[TQ  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) @:'swO/\<  
    }gE?ms4$  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented uvo2W!  
    3D textures !6t ()]  
    Source definition ,0^:q)_  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist P:z5/??2S  
    i,=CnZCh  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition b"+ J8W  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface `(|jm$Q  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) ^-3R+U- S  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities Qt_LBJUWV  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) c&Pgz~iP  
    q]%c 6{w  
    TracePro features not in LT N?d4Pu1m  
    Ray trace through GRIN material YuWsE4$  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Ku{DdiTg>  
    t:m2[U_}  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT utq*<,^  
    B]K@'#  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT /? n 9c;w  
    NGHzifaE   
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) gt3;Xi  
    RVmD&  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT M2ig iR  
    SSANt?\Z<  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) Aj06"ep  
    s9 '*Vm  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP RHo|&.B;+  
    9,|&+G$  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons hia_CuY#  
    W! FmC$Kc  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 9k_3=KS3N  
    D/_=rAl1  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 1!. CfQi  
    w$*t.Q*  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools \M/XM6:UG4  
    Au'[|Pr r  
    Fl GKy9k  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 '\dau>  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented *ms?UFV[r  
    Dqu1!f  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 E)%]?/w  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 >S5:zz\  
        z;UkK  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!