切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 18792阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview u"MfxW`  
    v6H!.0  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability s<;{q+1#  
    Yyw9IYB;  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 1:RK~_E  
    Wr@q+Whq  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses %XQJ!sC`  
    pgW^hj\  
    User Interface _$/Bt?h  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only nbW.x7  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous --k!KrL  
    %!DTq`F  
    Modeling C)~%(< D  
    Most elements cannot be edited s )Xz}QPK.  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) (:^YfG~e  
    No unboolean capability Y5y7ONcn  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time Vh^ :.y   
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses TxH amI l  
    ]bbP_n8  
    Ray Trace 8bf@<VTO_  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace (=j/"Mb  
    No point sources; no volume sources =@&>r5W1  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) a p(PI?]X  
    F0"("4h:  
    Analysis jAovzZ6BL  
    No illumination error estimate O_ vH w^  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” <dAxB$16sT  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres ^5)=) xVF  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro mRt/ d  
    n]nJ$u1u  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro ,|]k4F  
    Interactive ray trace EpTc{  
    Editable geometry :GFK |  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) vP_mS 4X  
    ~mZ[@ Z  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented #TV #*  
    3D textures LMN`<R(q]  
    Source definition 3Vk\iJ  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist BAG#YZB  
    ')iyD5/4  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition ,#9i=gp  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface <e wcWr  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 7\H_9o0$  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities bIzBY+P  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) H`yUSB IP  
    u Tdz$Nh  
    TracePro features not in LT |`|zo+aW  
    Ray trace through GRIN material j'Gezx^.<e  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP aU#r`D@0  
    vq\L9$WJ  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT NFG~PZ`6R  
    A6xN6{R!  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT DZ:$p.  
    DweF8c  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) kk OjAp{<t  
    '*`1uomeo  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT SP vKq=,  
    f %P#.  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) [vnxp/v/<  
    r jnf30  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP gEmsPk,  
    s -F3(mc(  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ;Wn0-`_1,  
    {axRq'=  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP iE]^ 6i  
    N*KM6j  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software kPSi6ci  
    w-Q=oEt  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools Wa iM\h?=#  
    C`aUitL}  
    JNI&]3[C>?  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 k vt^s0T8Q  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented =05jjR1  
    ,!98V Jmr  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 \'B%lXh  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 <fDbz1Q;l  
        Fn;Gq-^7@  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!