切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20078阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 50_[n$tqE  
    Ps!umV  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability y+3+iT@i  
    &S,_Z/BS;  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools *4/FN TC  
    >)F "lR:o  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses * xCY^_  
    >H^#!eaqw  
    User Interface |lt]9>|  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only q3AqU?f  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous )adV`V%=>  
    AdVc1v&>  
    Modeling l+[:Cni  
    Most elements cannot be edited x-"8V(  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) %x N${4)6  
    No unboolean capability T'9ZR,{F  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time Y=p!xr>  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses GL=}Vu`(*  
    '`3#FCg  
    Ray Trace XEgJ7h_  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace - 8p!,+Dk  
    No point sources; no volume sources "!~o  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) ^Jp,&  
    7 p{Pmq[  
    Analysis v8)"skVnFG  
    No illumination error estimate ? 3=G'Ip5n  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” e"ehH#i  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Gq^vto  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro BDT L5N  
    G3~`]qf  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro TaN{xpo  
    Interactive ray trace gcU*rml  
    Editable geometry ;f[lq^eV  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) :OG I|[  
    c-sjYJXKM*  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented U[@y 8yN6M  
    3D textures Y()" 2CCV  
    Source definition 1^!SuAA@  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist # ]7Lieh[5  
    ;-+q*@sa]  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition D|N4X`T`  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface  !+eH8  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 0cd_l 2f#g  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities Zh=a rlk  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) ^[M{s(b  
    '<R>cN"  
    TracePro features not in LT \$ytmtf5  
    Ray trace through GRIN material F5h/>  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Vy\Vpp  
    -(qRC0V  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT g7\ =  
    H@Dpht>[  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT eb62(:=N6  
    ,_2-Op  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) RkF#NCnL;  
    YX\vk/[|  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT Q7 BbST+  
    g'8Y5x[  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) j~CnMKN  
    i0vm00oT  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP ,>GHR{7>(  
    D|]BFu)F  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons iUx\3d,  
    34@[ZKJ5  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP hAGHb+:  
    z/@_?01T=  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software wQ}r/2n|^  
    Z_d"<k}I  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools Ey6R/M)?:y  
    oMh$:jR$  
    V%Uj\cv  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 YOCEEh?  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented K1& QAXyP  
    'h>uR|  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 x 7j#@C  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 _( W@FS  
        ^ Ltho`  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!