切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19595阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview -I z,vd  
    07\]8^/G  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability kt7Emb}  
    i-4?]h k  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools mR#"ng  
    ,,g: x  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses #wGOlW;R  
    =`!# V/=  
    User Interface I]Z"?T  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only oJc7a z  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 3qDuF  
    dd@ D s  
    Modeling KPZqPtb;  
    Most elements cannot be edited qg*xdefQ%  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ;Wn0-`_1,  
    No unboolean capability aq9Ej]1b  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time n0uL^{B  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 1V]j8  
    wFJ*2W:  
    Ray Trace Wa iM\h?=#  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace =[)2DJC  
    No point sources; no volume sources .]; `  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) Ujvk*~:  
    Qs 'dwc  
    Analysis WmblY2  
    No illumination error estimate Nu><r  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” d81[hT}q  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Ft@ZK!'@  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro (>-(~7PR  
    %:Zp7O2UB'  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro $o*p#LU  
    Interactive ray trace UJ&gm_M+kL  
    Editable geometry fBP J8VY  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) VS+5{w:t  
    M:%Ll3  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented {<2q  
    3D textures o H]FT{  
    Source definition px^brzLQo  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist )GJlQ1x  
    p5bM/{DP;K  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition >soSOJ[   
    New LT 4.0 User Interface wKy4Ic+RV  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) P1"g62R  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities 'V*8'?  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) a0cW=0l=  
    NqN9  
    TracePro features not in LT * Vymb  
    Ray trace through GRIN material `R o>?H  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Ijs=4f  
    [,mcvO;  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT $I90KQB\_  
    t Ow[  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT "QV1G'  
    Bqb3[^;~  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) U,nQnD"!t&  
    `O}bPwa{>  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT ,9/s`o  
    Q9 RCN<!  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) 0"=}d y  
    Rj,M|9Y)o  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP CV6W)B%Se  
    -!ERe@k(  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons gPWl#5P:  
     tD}HL_  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP \( xQ'AQ-  
    .#ATI<t  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software ^b(> Bg )T  
    [KwwhI@3  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools 9 TW  
    .[#bOp*  
    {v}jV{'^um  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 Q Ph6 p3bg  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented L\UM12  
    4WV)&50  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 $Uxg$pqO  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 hTbot^/  
        t ~"DQq E  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!