切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19856阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview q>^hoW2$C  
    3^!Hl8P7  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability 1a<]$tZk  
    }X=87ud  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools %4j&H!y-w;  
    LYp'vZ!  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 3AK(dC[ri  
    zu52 p4  
    User Interface ([Ebsj  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only bFSlf5*H  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous ,*7H|de7   
    2-~a P  
    Modeling N;<//,  
    Most elements cannot be edited \ZS\i4  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) JL.5QzA  
    No unboolean capability Yrpxy.1=F5  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time Wdo#?@m  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses k5a\Sq}  
    Uh.Sc:trA  
    Ray Trace u yFn}y62  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace sMH#BCC  
    No point sources; no volume sources @&5A&(  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) Ivsb<qzG  
    a"QU:<-v  
    Analysis f/ajejYo?,  
    No illumination error estimate +e'X;  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” !h>D;k6 e  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres  {7X#4o0  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro Jf)3< ~G  
    t+Z`n(>  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro !%xP}{(7  
    Interactive ray trace m"Qq{p|'  
    Editable geometry 55-D\n<  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) -4flV D  
    8Mu;U3cIW  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented : ,p||_G&  
    3D textures B!bsTvX  
    Source definition HR60   
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist \cQ .|S  
    @u) 'yS  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition zX kx7d8  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface \DA$6w\\  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) wqD5d   
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities ~O;y?]U  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) `.=sTp2rbc  
    _8><| 3d  
    TracePro features not in LT )"`!AerJ  
    Ray trace through GRIN material R8&|+ya  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP 1f4 bt6[  
    5PZN^\^  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT x*}bo))hb  
    ?a.+j8pbGg  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT |}[nH>  
    EO)%UrWnC  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) "Xn%at4  
    R1ktj  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT (~s|=Hxq|-  
    $h28(K%  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) 5j^NV&/_  
    _:J*Cm[q  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP S>Z|) I  
     k0H#:c}  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons A6UO0lyu  
    mBk5+KyT  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP [-w@.^:]X  
    V#83!  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software O}Le]2'  
    2t1I3yA'{z  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools WDx Mo`zT  
    j9y3hQ+q  
    -50AX1h31:  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 ;IZ?19Q  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented OXhAha`R  
    cF+ X,]=6  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 d"T Ht}  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 G?hK9@ |v  
        O/OiQ^T  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!