切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19857阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview u8*0r{kOH  
    'py k  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability (\j<`"n  
    ?~!h N,h  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools X^ovP'c2  
    g!$ "CX%8  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses (/%}a`2#o  
    1g;3MSn~  
    User Interface -I -wdyDr  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only .}tL:^'~o  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous B7#;tCf  
    Z1Ms ~tch  
    Modeling E_++yK^=  
    Most elements cannot be edited ]SQ_*$`  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) T/H*Bo *=5  
    No unboolean capability t[<=QK  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time 5+U~ZW0|+  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses , 7}Ri  
    ^!A{ 4NV  
    Ray Trace +Y .As  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 8J)x>6  
    No point sources; no volume sources NWKD:{  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) P?bdjU#_n`  
    hVd63_OO  
    Analysis qWWy}5SOm  
    No illumination error estimate o}[wu:>yk  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” ~WVrtYJu  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres v'|Dj^3[  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro AR&u9Y)I  
    HIF.;ImG^  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro ~x824xW  
    Interactive ray trace f9; M"Pd  
    Editable geometry v=|ahsYC  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) eQMY3/#  
    ,UY],;ib  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented gPDc6{/C<  
    3D textures vRm;H|[%S  
    Source definition J.~$^-&!  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist Uh*V>HA#  
    ZE4~rq/W  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition {D$#m  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface zxXm9zrLo  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) $n!saPpxS  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities _8kZ>w(L  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) GBN^ *I  
    U^[<G6<9]  
    TracePro features not in LT Ow<=K:^  
    Ray trace through GRIN material 5_{C \S`T  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP d XrLeoK  
    L3,p8-d9Z  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT (;V6L{Rf>  
    dFK/  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT *e!0ZB3J  
    2{% U\^-  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) Q"S;r1 D  
    *ax$R6a#X  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT `VwZDU~6  
    <Zl}u:(w  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ~+7q.XL$$K  
    b+9M? k"  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP D `c YQ-  
    =Z2Cg{z  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons FIDV5Y/f  
    IZoS2^:yw  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP HM /2/ /  
    _?]bd-E  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 8XIG<Nc  
    yyW;VKN  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools ' @i0~  
    c@>Tzk%?"  
    F !g>fIg  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 dj>zy  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented 3|x*lmit  
    wc`UcGO  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 xkV(E!O  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 =bgzl=A`  
        I7,5ID4pn  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!