切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19520阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview Vq^b_^  
    :\%hv>}|  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability v2YU2-X[  
    OK z5;#S=  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools xJOp ~fKG  
    ?gjkgCbC#  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses khQ fLA  
    TnuA uui*  
    User Interface V0_^==Vs  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Ol;"}3*Z*  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous ,,?XGx  
    xSq+>,b  
    Modeling T6\d]  
    Most elements cannot be edited +5%ncSJx  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 8boiJku`  
    No unboolean capability >=3oe.$)  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time &-Q_%eM^  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses r6nWrO>y  
    u\f Qa QV  
    Ray Trace `/(9 #E  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace ZtpbKy!\$B  
    No point sources; no volume sources OZe`>Q6  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) ^[q/w<_j~  
    Y{8}z ZD  
    Analysis T5_rPz  
    No illumination error estimate \WZSY||C|_  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” ] B>.}  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres 8(H!iKHe  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro ^,Ft7JAn  
    Uf|@h  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro 1:q`KkJx  
    Interactive ray trace ,F=FM>o  
    Editable geometry sTxbh2  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) RVr5^l;"  
    3WPZZN<K9  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented {7EpljH@  
    3D textures }?9A:&  
    Source definition $qiM_06  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist `F_R J.g*p  
    ;/!o0:m^I  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition Dt'bbX'edw  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface p R ! m  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) @/='BVb'T  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities RH;A|[7T&  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) z#6(PZC}  
    ?',GRaD  
    TracePro features not in LT Y,-! QFS#  
    Ray trace through GRIN material Xj<xen(  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP /#[mV(k  
    )k81  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT 43*;"w=  
    4p>,  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT cvjZ$Fcc%(  
    VwT&A9&{8  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) ^$y`Q@-9  
    "71Y{WQ   
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT 7s 0pH+  
    }5}#QHF  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) U[hokwZ  
    gj4ONmY  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP PVrNS7 Rk/  
     X*`b}^T  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons |A2o$H  
    dlMjy$/T  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP N"zl7.E  
    p@wtT"Y  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software _!%@V=  
    Q!h+1fb  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools n%6=w9.%c  
    m[Qr>="  
    [!4V_yOb  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 ucUu hS5  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented sfsK[c5bm  
    Jjh=zxR>  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 r<'B\.#tp>  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 4r9AUmJqw  
        F mQiy+.|  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!