切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19511阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview $l,Zd6<1q  
    Eu/y">;v#  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability xGEmrE<;  
    TDFO9%2c  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ~8xh0TSi  
    vk)0n=  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Z-t}6c'Kg  
    Ue3B+k9w  
    User Interface XK%W^a*x  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only WiNr866nB  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 2rO)qjiH  
    oB0 8  
    Modeling +t>*l>[  
    Most elements cannot be edited >{ECyh;  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 'EL ||  
    No unboolean capability YO(:32S  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time o9 i#N  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses BZJKiiD  
    Kd/[ Bs%  
    Ray Trace dv^e 9b|  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 6; 5)/q  
    No point sources; no volume sources +MNSZLP]  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) QJ a4R  
    n5egKAgA  
    Analysis N b3I%r  
    No illumination error estimate Ii~; d3.  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” zP :~O  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres ^91sl5c8yD  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro <#xrrRhm}  
    g|ql 5jW  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro "H5&3sF2  
    Interactive ray trace ATMc`z:5T  
    Editable geometry >"cr-LB  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) 09R,'QJ|  
    Z$!C=  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented M4TrnZ1D}  
    3D textures v[R_S  
    Source definition e> ar  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist 7'_nc!ME  
    ':,>eL#+uV  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition qPsyqn?Y|  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface "w*@R8v  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) .=Pm>o/,  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities /"(b.&  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) R `;o!B}[  
    (JevHdI*V  
    TracePro features not in LT dKU5;  
    Ray trace through GRIN material >4Iv[ D1  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP rW[SU:  
    gk"mr_03  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT (Ar?QwP9>  
    yHl@_rN sC  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT ?LM:RADCm  
    y0;,dv]  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) GXO4x|08F  
    6%>/og\%  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT b 1cd&e  
    otU@X 3<_  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) m6-76ma,hi  
    b<\$d4Qy  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP ?;Un#6b  
    ^,Xa IP+[  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons &%6NQWW  
    t{~@I  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 9MT3T?IS  
    &T7cH>E'K^  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 1f<RyAE?5  
    A&NqQ V,  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools !\ZcOk2  
    $}db /hY*  
    V(r`.75  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 b) Ux3PB  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented %0lf  
    RYH)AS4w'  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 n6/fan;  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 Y_+ SA|s  
        4Ppop  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!