[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: &sq q+&ao  
%z1hXh#+  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) ylmVmHmc  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 S{cK~sZj  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 qE^u{S4Z@  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 rp-.\Hl/a  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 w
h]v{Fi'  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 5Shc$Awc!  
]{-ib:f
~  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: wtnC^d$  
>FM2T<.;  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) aRF}FE,u  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 P>i[X0UnL  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 \B~}s}  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 %Y//}  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 nhPua&  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 S+&Bf ~~D  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 `Kq4z62V  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 IX)\z  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! ]]^eIjg>a6  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 P5Is#7udN8  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德