[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: ${ {4L?7  
4\;zz85E  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) Mn0.!J "  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 *dBeb  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 9-42A7g^C  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 'c3
5%?]  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Xh@K89`uX  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 yfG;OnkZ  
KL&/Yt  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: +R~]5Rxd  
( fFrX_K]  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) uI,*&bP  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Zr}>>aIJ]k  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 LW=qX%o{  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Q4mtfpiDx  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 %<yW(s9{  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 e{8C0=  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 oIrc))j,$  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 #hBqgG:>  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! Tu:lIy~A  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 Y(JZP\Tf_N  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德