[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: A%Xt|=^_  
&O)
&k  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) &X|<@'933  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 !" JfOu  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 &n[~!%(  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 n4R2^gX
Aw  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 b1gaj"]  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Z<#hS=eY  
>Jw6l0z  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 9 L?;FY)_  
2 ?|gnbE:  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) _2hXa!yO  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 @!Hr|k|  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 b-@\R\T  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 P20|RvE  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ,>LRa  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 "Vd_CO  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 K3mAXC,d  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 OQ4c#V?  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中!  pbB2wt  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 nGZ\<-  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德