[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: q2+`a;_
S  
99GK6}~TGm  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) [iXkv\  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Mg~62u  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 9P1!<6mN\  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 `G'Z,P-a  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Mni@@W  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 >PS`;S!(  
2F&VG|"  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: q0*d*j F0u  
z9 $1jC  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) O ]!/fZ;(  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 aL|a2+P[`q  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 n{"e8vQx
 
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 rm%MQmF  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Y'O3RA5E  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 8SN
4E  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 >Yx,%a@~R  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 2CRgOFR  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! :|N(:W>=$Y  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 h5}:>yc  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德