[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: mh{d8<Q2  
k&q;JyUi  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) J+DDh=%  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 =/+-<px  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 _LUhZlw  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 @R"JW\bd  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 sPQQ"|wU  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 $}q23  
f#"J]p  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: [kB7@o  
N!=v4f  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) Y=I'czg  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000
2\{M:\2o  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 i$#;Kpb`^  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Pn1^NUMZJ  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 _8J.fT$${  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ~jk|4`I?T  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ie95rZp  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 0i>5<ej,f
 
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! ]%H`_8<gc  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 lymCH  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德