[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: !JZ)6mtlr  
v
;=F$3  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) s zgq7  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 1Yj^N"=  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 |3tq
.JU
  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 {(o$? =  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 |8xu*dVAp4  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ][Ne;F6  
TL%2?'G  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: .{pc5eUf  
^#^\@jLm  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) BKiyog  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 OPYl#3I  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 =wd=TX/  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 @zz4,,
]  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 v6Vd V.BI  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 85QVj] nr  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 UK{6Rh ;  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 dZSv=UY)  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! Qh3V[br  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 /7bIE!Cn  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德