[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: `J;g~#/k  
+}BKDEb  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) R,-DP/ (im  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 GMpg+rK  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 p;mV?B?oAQ  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ~SwGZ  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 }#nd&ND  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 O1oh,~W  
CH6;jo]  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: >ni0:^vp  
Z3-=TN  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) _*wlK;`  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 4?c0rC<  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 >|1-o;UU  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 9{-H/YS\_s  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ].@8/. rg  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Gf-GDy\{  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 r(g#3i4Q  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 !fJy7Y  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! "P$')uwE  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 h#uk-7  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德