[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: uk,f}Xc  
)f Rh^6  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) Za w+  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 nj mE>2  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 16vfIUt
b  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 h%%'{^>~  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 k"J
?-1L  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 AI2CfH#:C  
71_N9ub@z  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 6`'^$wKs  
V5=Injs*  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) PqfH}d0l  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Epx.0TA=t  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 8_>R'u[  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 4WLB,<b}  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ,W.O*vC
A  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 H]cCyuCdH  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 1UOFTI2S|  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 \o/oM,u  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! G>"w$Us  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ^ 14U]<  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德