[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: }Sv\$h  
x A"V!8C  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) WeE1 \  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 S?e*<s9k  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 >@uFye$  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 %IHra6  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 m(p0)X),_i  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 a n,$Z,G#K  
^;mnP=`l[  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: ~R C\  
<(W:Q3?s  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) %{ +>\0x
  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 y?ypRCgO.u  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 VX]Ud\(  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 C1po]Ott*  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 E<r<ObeRv`  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 KkyZd9  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 %hN7K  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 rB}2F*eT  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! AQTV1f_  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 Eg4_kp0Lq
 
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德