[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients:
}_:#fE  
lEbR)B,  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) k;AiG8jb  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 -_*XhD  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 t>GLZzO  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 >\x_"oR  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 9hLmrYNM1
 
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 p z+}7  
M(WOxZ8  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: &(uF&-PwO4  
Ibv_D$cT  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) E_![`9i  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 C`th^dqBV  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 K'{W9~9Lq  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Ubw!/|mi  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ?<yq 2`\4O  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 $YGIN7_Gg  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 5Ckk5b  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 4z0R\tjT  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! (/"K+$8'  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ?Do^stq'4  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德