[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: KL]!E ~i  
GYxI$y0:  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) d 4R+gIA  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 IIiN1 Lu,5  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 kELyD(^P`  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 K~T\q_ZPZ  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 [{$0E=&0  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :`1g{8.+  
ypo=y/!  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: g_c)Ts(  
lILtxVBO2o  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) y@\Q@ 9  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 utJVuJw:t  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 NVWeJ+w  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 #ic 2ofI  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (ul-J4E\O  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 \OT)KVwO  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 [Fj+p4*N  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 G5y  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! DR yESi  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 {C/L5cZ]J  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德