[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: X.{S*E:$u  
"ze|W\Bv!  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) ea 'D td  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 oD.Cs'  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :crW9+  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 qo bc<-  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 1>h]{%I  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 $%#!bV  
fIU#M]Xx  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: gg2(5FPP  
4o[{>gW  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) G"A#Q"  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 F:S}w  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 k8zI(5.>
 
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 UkFC~17P  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 LKDO2N  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 A.w.rVDD  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 o }m3y  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 cw <l{A  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! N$tGQ@  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 '<uq3?5  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德