[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: p6M
jVu  
t4R
I%m\  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) xIN&>D'|N  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 TJHab;7F  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 DcO$&)Eb  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 YTc X4cC  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 [f^:V:){  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 xH\#:DLY  
(V:z7  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: IO@Ti(,  
^$!H|  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) [P3].#"]M=  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 6>X9|w
  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 B24,;2J  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 R4#56#d<  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 3pk=c-x  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ~S85+OJ;M  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 <o aVI?  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 hhM?I$t:  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! @@QB,VS;{<  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 Nxr%xTD  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德