[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 1X!f!0=g+  
c|;|%"Mk  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) Oa_o"p
<Lr  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 2*7s9g  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 }:c,SO!  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 MTFVnoZMQ_  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :v WYII7  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 UV *tO15i  
ZjI/zqBm  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: V@xnz)^t  
>v4~:n2D  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) GKDG5u;  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 yaGVY*M0  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 2{tJ'3  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 &CsBG?@Z|  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 `2~Ea_Z  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 [0 f6uIF  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 /OtQk-E  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 fOfz^W  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! #nhAW  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ^Pwq`GA  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德