[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: > kwhZ/x  
gV*4{d`  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) V9%9nR!'  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 u;b6uE  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 $XKUw"%  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ?zVcP=p@  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 !#E-p?O.  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 @Y+kg  
]{I>HA5[  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: s2nZW pIy  
YT@H^=  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) lDs C>L-F  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 `EiL~*  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 eJEcLK3u  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 x+1-^XvK  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 {|e7^_ke  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ?1X7jn`,+  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ZjnWbnW  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 WkoYkkuzj  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! sAPYQ  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 qg8T}y>  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德