[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: g37q/nEv  
oa0X5}D  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) &telCg:  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ltEF:{mLe#  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 R#0{Wg0O)  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 )Xno|$b5Eo  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ##~!M(c  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 a>b8-j=J  
4;\Y?M}g?  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: DZ%8 |PmB  
mVHFT~x7}  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) ]eD[4Y\#t  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 )=Y-f?o!  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 O E]~@eU  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 )Kr(Y.w  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 g!\QIv1D  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 3m~U(yho  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 0pCDEs  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Ul9b.`6  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! {-~05,zE  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ^Tb}]aHg  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德