[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: Lh rU fy  
z=1N}l~|*  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) 3EO:Uk5<  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 8RaRXnJ  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 `m+o^!SGe  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 f)#rBAkt  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 %s*F~E  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 4IGn,D^  
"l[ c/q[  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients:  [yx8?5  
<`")Zxf+  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) AQjf\i  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 oef]  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 1<F6{?,z  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 -jk-ve  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 dM)x|b3z  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 BI6]{ZC"  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 H>Q X?>j  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 @TvDxY1)6Z  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! K>_~|ZN1C8  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 V
(M7d>N5G  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德