[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: Jh0Grq  
n 5R9<A^  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) :\P@c(c{^C  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 OyVP_Yx,V  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 T2S_> #."l  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 _*6]4\;  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 myR{}G  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 O^`EuaL  
A~PR  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: P0.cF]<m  
XG.[C>  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) rpRyB9  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 fQa*>**j;  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 WT ;2aS:  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 %, psUOY  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 G(a5@9F  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 nXRa_M(z8  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 =8T!ldVxES  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 mF;mJq<d  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! dun`/QKV  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 \n[kzi7  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德