[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: gP|-A`y  
{m3#1iV9  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT)
NKEmY-f;  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 n>,GmCo  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 oR8'^G0<  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ->OVNmCB`+  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :!cK?H$+  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 &=S:I!9;;  
OpazWcMoo  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: (K8Ob3zN_  
'oY#a9~Z{  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) <FU?^
*~  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ]&P\|b1*g  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 +ansN~3  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 H#V&5|K%  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 '@@!lV  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 w1-P6cf  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 N>*+Wg$Ne  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 u_+iH$zA
 
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! /o m++DxV  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 pqfX}x  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德