[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: N;Hoi8W  
<[.{aj]QV  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) P"*#mH[W|  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 *^[m?3"W  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 oF'_x,0  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 <MK4
#I1I  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 zXX=WH  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 N"/J1   
Z4ekBdmCL  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: > I>=/i^  
he!Uq%e  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) _uL8TC^  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 @ JfQ}`  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 bHRRgR`,  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 {Gvv^.H7  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 i'YM9*yN  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 X..<U}e
 
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 RW`+F|UbE  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 nPR*mbW  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! h\/T b8  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 1q/Q@O  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德