[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: q+gqa<kM  
W.zA1S  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) rm3~]  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 @YpA'cX7  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ]Z<{ ~  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 uZmfvMr3  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 x*BfRj  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 JWMIZ{/M  
1/a*8vuGh  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: n~K_|  
s{IycTbz  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) O$#`he/jm  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 6"j
q/Pu  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 E8FS jLZ  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 SwSBQq%h]M  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 8#7z5:_  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 JRU)AMMU&  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ,Y9lp)w  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 2,NQ(c_c$  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! 7P=1+2V  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 5pE[}@-c9  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德