有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
dx;k`r$w a
^%"7Ri http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 j2 !3rI : }`-B0 Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
.Lfo)?zG )#LpCM,a I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
|{,KRO0P T~b>B`_ The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
f-r]
|k available, but more difficult to use.