有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
fZqMznF E,]G Ek http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 ##gq{hgjb$ hrpql_9. Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
Tl.dr ,4bqjkX5q I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
x
\.qzi ]ov>VF,< The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
a=<l}`* available, but more difficult to use.