有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
/:FOPPs }-@`9(o`) http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 xL" |)A = +[tP_%/r'^ Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
dc rSz4E|> KSrx[q I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
|ely|U. Tf =J~ x The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
^k\e8F/ available, but more difficult to use.
