有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
Gyu = } 3Mh_ &%!O http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 +S V!QMIg ,DKW_F| Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
]I~BgE;C9 x =JZ"|TE I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
e,vgD kI; ke*&*mx"L The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
9Lt3^MKa" available, but more difficult to use.
