有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
Eelv i5 qcQq.cS_'N http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 5a)$:oO! DVKb `KJ" Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
{{gt>"D, 5dD8s-; ^T I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
BS?$eai@:9 49}WJC7
) The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
]?oJx W. available, but more difficult to use.
