How Many Rays Do I Need for Monte Carlo Optimization? isiehKkD
While it is important to ensure that a sufficient number of rays are traced to TC$)::C1
distinguish the merit function value from the noise floor, it is often not necessary to 'gQ0=6(\
trace as many rays during optimization as you might to obtain a given level of W-UMX',0zS
accuracy for analysis purposes. What matters during optimization is that the i`hr'}x
changes the optimizer makes to the model affect the merit function in the same way CW)JS3}W"
that the overall performance is affected. It is possible to define the merit function so q*E <~!jL
that it has less accuracy and/or coarser mesh resolution than meshes used for #lld*I"d
analysis and yet produce improvements during optimization, especially in the early 5y`n8. (?
stages of a design. X@ j.$0 eK
A rule of thumb for the first Monte Carlo run on a system is to have an average of at +t hkx$o
least 40 rays per receiver data mesh bin. Thus, for 20 bins, you would need 800 rays ].e4a;pt
on the receiver to achieve uniform distribution. It is likely that you will need to A)j',jE&1
define more rays than 800 in a simulation in order to get 800 rays on the receiver. Zl4 X,9Wt
When using simplified meshes as merit functions, you should check the before and t5"g 9`A L
after performance of a design to verify that the changes correlate to the changes of &ap&dM0@%a
the merit function during optimization. As a design reaches its final performance l1 ?$quM^V
level, you will have to add rays to the simulation to reduce the noise floor so that tW)K pX
sufficient accuracy and mesh resolution are available for the optimizer to find the , A@uSfC(
best solution.
