切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 8421阅读
    • 13回复

    [原创]lighttools背光模拟 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线成龙
     
    发帖
    102
    光币
    143
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2009-05-14
    初上手lighttools做背光贴几个图大家看看大家给点建议: 4OTrMT$y  
    lDVw2J'p  
    z:)z]6  
    .:9XpKbt  
       16|miK[@  
    交流探讨QQ:859504158 Z1N=tL  
    希望大家都多给点意见
    本主题包含附件,请 登录 后查看, 或者 注册 成为会员
    1条评分
    doucan 金钱 +5 - 2009-05-14
     
    分享到
    离线成龙
    发帖
    102
    光币
    143
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2009-05-18
    欢迎广大背光朋友提出见解!!!
    离线cheering
    发帖
    77
    光币
    1
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2009-05-20
    我不是做背光的,对背光也不太了解 VmP5`):?b  
    我想请教一下,做背光和做一般照明的区别。 Sp./*h\}  
    fK; I0J  
    谢谢!
    离线myjobpeter
    发帖
    51
    光币
    61
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2009-07-15
    还不错,挺均匀,不过真够亮的
    离线yanglm
    发帖
    25
    光币
    9
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2009-08-13
    我也是做背光的,不知为什么,借用一下楼主的图说明一下问题,得到的总是发光强度的分布,不像楼主是照度的分布,请大家指点。。。
    发帖
    51
    光币
    45
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2009-08-13
    新手 看不懂哦
    离线barryrao
    发帖
    79
    光币
    62
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2009-08-13
    学习中.........
    离线成龙
    发帖
    102
    光币
    143
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2009-08-28
    你可以建立空间亮度接受器!!
    离线chengipx
    发帖
    29
    光币
    8
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2009-09-04
    学习一下。。
    离线成龙
    发帖
    102
    光币
    143
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2009-09-15
    How Many Rays Do I Need for Monte Carlo Optimization? pb}4{]sI  
    While it is important to ensure that a sufficient number of rays are traced to }W$}blbp  
    distinguish the merit function value from the noise floor, it is often not necessary to Z$2Vd`XP  
    trace as many rays during optimization as you might to obtain a given level of ^5 ~)m6=2  
    accuracy for analysis purposes. What matters during optimization is that the 15wwu} X  
    changes the optimizer makes to the model affect the merit function in the same way kf2e-)uUs  
    that the overall performance is affected. It is possible to define the merit function so ?PDrj/: *  
    that it has less accuracy and/or coarser mesh resolution than meshes used for mBWhC<kKs  
    analysis and yet produce improvements during optimization, especially in the early p^i]{"sjbU  
    stages of a design. O`FuXB(t  
    A rule of thumb for the first Monte Carlo run on a system is to have an average of at i=j4Wg,{J  
    least 40 rays per receiver data mesh bin. Thus, for 20 bins, you would need 800 rays <G#z;]N  
    on the receiver to achieve uniform distribution. It is likely that you will need to 73tWeZ8rvx  
    define more rays than 800 in a simulation in order to get 800 rays on the receiver. }I ^e:,{  
    When using simplified meshes as merit functions, you should check the before and -KU@0G  
    after performance of a design to verify that the changes correlate to the changes of {p M3f  
    the merit function during optimization. As a design reaches its final performance Cswa5 l`af  
    level, you will have to add rays to the simulation to reduce the noise floor so that egy#8U)Z  
    sufficient accuracy and mesh resolution are available for the optimizer to find the ff<ad l-  
    best solution.