Optical system alignment system and method with high accuracy and simple operation b,#cc>76\
i5(_.1X<#{
Abstract +0^ N#0)
A system for aligning of optical components includes an interferometer and a first diffractive alignment element. A housing is used for positioning a first optical element being aligned. A detector is used for detecting fringes produced by reflections off surfaces of the first optical element. A grating pattern on the first diffractive alignment element is designed to produce a retro-reflected wavefront or a wavefront transmitted or reflected in a predetermined direction when the first optical element is in alignment. The first diffractive alignment element includes a first region for alignment of the interferometer, a second region for alignment of one surface of the first optical element, and a third region for alignment of another surface of the first optical element. The first, second and third regions can be of any shape such as circular, rectangular, triangular, or the like. RCND|X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WvAl!^{`
Inventors: Harned, Robert D.; (Redding, CT) ; Harned, Nora-Jean; (Redding, CT) 3S_KycE{
Correspondence Name and Address: STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC &+J5GHt@
1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. H
\.EKZ
WASHINGTON bqS*WgMY-
DC Y GO ;wIS
20005 H_o<!YxK
US Q^Y>T&Q
P=KOw;bs
D4c}z#}*0
Assignee Name and Adress: ASML Holding N.V. MP w@O0QS
Veldhoven q~;P^i<Y
NL .Uh-Wi[
ceH7Rq:4W
%UV_
3
Serial No.: 938954 SdnqM`uFo
Series Code: 10 1 mFc]1W
Filed: September 13, 2004 z=?ainnKx
qV/"30,K
U.S. Current Class: 356/508 3-hu'xSU
U.S. Class at Publication: 356/508 Gvtd )9^<
Intern'l Class: G01B 009/02 RRV@nDf
rQ30)5^V|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [\ @!~F{
RgRyo
Claims 85w
D<bN27
Kcsje_I-M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v9x $`
Mff_j0D
What is claimed is: 9/~m837x
1. A system for aligning of optical components, comprising: an interferometer; a reference optic; a first diffractive alignment element having a grating pattern thereon; a housing that positions a first optical element being aligned; and a detector that detects fringes produced by reflections off surfaces of the first optical element, wherein the grating pattern produces diffracted wavefronts that align the first diffractive alignment element to the reference optic and that align the first optical element. nDMNaMYb
fR_)e:
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first diffractive alignment element comprises: a first region that aligns the interferometer; a second region that aligns one surface of the first optical element; and a third region that aligns another surface of the first optical element. zc*qmb
lU:z>gC
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the first, second and third regions are generally circular. *yiJw\DRN
m&Ms[X
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the circular regions are non-concentric. lBD{)Va
eq(|%]a=
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the circular regions are decentered relative to an optical axis of the system. PcM:0(,G
j<8_SD =,
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the first diffractive alignment element is capable of being replaced by a second diffractive optical alignment that aligns a second optical component. '?_I-="Mr
W=GNo9:
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the first diffractive alignment element comprises a plurality of regions, each region used for alignment of a different surface of a plurality of optical components being aligned within the housing. :*0k:h6g
;Zw!
8. The system of claim 7, wherein at least one of the regions is used for alignment of an aspheric surface. ?rk3oa-
9} eIidw K
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of regions correspond to a plurality of surfaces of a multi-element lens being aligned. :M1+[FT
j9y,UT
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the first optical element is a reflective element. y;;^o6Gnw
hy
W4=
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the first optical element is a refractive element. g#Zb}^
PM[6U#
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the first optical element is an off-axis optical element. K*7*`6iU
V=3NIw18
13. The system of claim 12, further comprising a second diffractive alignment optical element that produces interference fringes in the interferometer using a reflection off the off-axis optical element. EpOVrk
@#*B|lHE
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the second diffractive alignment optical element is a transmissive grating. 3|P P+<o
""d3ownKhw
15. The system of claim 13, wherein the second diffractive alignment optical element is a reflective grating. \<i#Jn+)
djZOx;/
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the first optical component has a spherical surface. a[lE9JA;|
;6fkG/T
17. The system of claim 1, wherein the first optical component has an aspheric surface. CU lANd"
q^"P_pV\
18. The system of claim 1, further comprising any one of a transmission flat, a transmission sphere, or a lens between the interferometer and the first diffractive alignment element. l*B;/
>nR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- {D1=TTr^
}eEF/o
Description %QwMB`x
b[e+(X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sBwkHsDD
~4XJ" d3L
9 I]*T
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS gl2~6"dc
l]oGhM;
[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/554,420, filed Mar. 19, 2004, titled "OPTICAL SYSTEM ALIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH HIGH ACCURACY AND SIMPLE OPERATION," which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. %#/7Tl:
x*Z"~'DI
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION <:q]t6]$
@ mtv2P`
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention (a&.Ad0{
khjW9Aa8t
[0003] The present invention relates to alignment of optical components, and more particularly, to alignment of reflective and refractive optical components in high precision optical systems. D2>=^WP6+
i+21t G$
[0004] 2. Related Art #V4_. t#
8Ln:y'K
[0005] Most multiple lens assemblies are currently aligned using one (or more) of the following methods: vlEd=H,LT
li/IKS)e$
[0006] (a) Mechanical indicators are used for either (or both) centering the outside diameter and minimizing the apparent wedge between lens surfaces relative to the lens cell; &EA4`p
}I05&/o.3p
[0007] (b) Alignment telescopes can be used for aligning centers of curvatures of the lens elements to a common optical axis; NFmB ^@k
>"zSW?
[0008] (c) Fabricating the lens elements and the lens cell to very tight optical and mechanical tolerances, so that a "slip fit" of the elements in the cell results in an aligned system; and lYQcQ*-
_F,@mQ$!
[0009] (d) Coarsely assembling the lens, measuring the lens' wavefront and distortion across its field of view, and calculating the adjustments required to each lens element to minimize the wavefront error and distortion. oE-i`;\8
o#%2N+w
[0010] For optical systems requiring diffraction-limited performance (as needed for lithography optics), the first three of these techniques do not have the necessary alignment accuracy. To even get close to diffraction-limited performance, state-of-the-art mechanical and optical measuring systems are required. Optimizing the alignment using measured wavefront and distortion data requires either of the first two alignment methods to be performed as a starting point. The alignment process that uses the measured wavefront and distortion data is an iterative process. Because of cross-coupling of errors in the optical system, several measurements and alignment adjustments are required to successfully align a system. The exact number of iterations required to align a system depends on the designed quality. 0fi+tc30
/SlCcozFL~
[0011] Aligning an optical system using mechanical indicators does not account for homogeneity errors that can have the same effect as a mechanical wedge. Mechanical indicators and their related tooling (air bearing rotary tables, etc.) do not have the required accurately to align high quality optical systems, such as lithography optical systems. Because a mechanical probe or an air gauge must either be in contact, or be in very close proximity, to the lens element being aligned, there are frequently mechanical interferences with the lens cell structure. The probe is actually measuring an extremely small region on the lens surface. This region may not accurately represent the full optical surface. rIS \#j
f.rHX<%q9B
[0012] An alignment telescope's sensitivity is limited by the angular resolution of its optical system, the distance between the lens being aligned and the alignment telescope, and how well the alignment telescope optics are aligned. Commercially available alignment telescopes do not have the required accuracy. A custom-designed and fabricated alignment telescope has a limited range over which it can be used, because it works only for a limited range of lens radii of curvatures. This results in the need to build at least several alignment telescopes (or additional optical elements and mechanical components to an existing alignment telescope), each of which has to be aligned to tolerances close to what is required for a lithography lens. Alignment telescopes are difficult to use on short radii of curvature lens surfaces, due to the small amount of light captured by the alignment telescope aperture. Alignment telescopes are also not usable with lenses and mirrors that have aspheric surfaces. The asphericity causes the image reflected off the surface being aligned to be badly aberrated, making it impossible to achieve fine alignment tolerances. t)$>++i
SJy:5e?zk
[0013] Measuring an optical systems wavefront and distortion, and then back-calculating the alignment errors, is very time consuming and difficult, unless one starts with the optical system being relatively close to the optimum alignment condition. Multiple alignment iterations are required because of the cross coupling of the alignment aberrations between all the surfaces. ;M@/AAZ
L.+5`&
[0014] Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a fast and simple method of aligning optical surfaces. K<