切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 18827阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 5M9 I,  
    ^v.,y3  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability vjjSKP6B  
    sdQkT#%y  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools F(t=!k,4\  
    fN'HE#W1Xa  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses l x,"EOP  
    ?B :a|0pf  
    User Interface JPGzrEaZ  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only sg+uBCGB  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous ss5 m/i7  
    msVO H%wH  
    Modeling ~#kT _*sw)  
    Most elements cannot be edited E*jP87g  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ei rzYt  
    No unboolean capability Y5F]:gs@  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time vap,y $C  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses &gjF4~W]  
    %Qj;,#z  
    Ray Trace 8jyG" %WO  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace +Z85HY{  
    No point sources; no volume sources t*?0D\b 2  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 6H'HxB4  
    5|1 T}Z#;  
    Analysis clk[/'1  
    No illumination error estimate 1bH;!J  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 0Q^Ikiv   
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres X=> =5'  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro &o<F7U'R  
    _%GGl$kH  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro n(el]_d  
    Interactive ray trace Yh>]-SCw  
    Editable geometry ?]x|Zy  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) I6Ce_|n ?k  
    5Lf{8UxI  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 7P9=)$(EH  
    3D textures !&"<oPjr+  
    Source definition 4fKC6UR  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist 8)4P Ll  
    ~t~-A,1  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition {>F7CT'G6  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface M{*Lp6h  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) [3!~PR]  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities K=,F#kn  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) [AW" D3  
    '60 L~`K  
    TracePro features not in LT _-#'j2  
    Ray trace through GRIN material #cCL.p"]  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP G^` 1]?  
    g2T -TG'd  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT ivW(*c  
    YE9,KVV;$n  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT oD$J0{K6  
    rhb@FE)Mc  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) $]A/ o(  
    ,.qMEMm  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT b%S62(qP  
    1hziXC0WY  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) 'FS?a  
    :=[XW?L%x  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP }~Af/  
    &T}''  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons (1NA  
    oun;rMq  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP q| LDo~H  
    V@\%)J'g  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software W[^qa5W<FB  
    dH^<t,v  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools _Y[jyD1>  
    $e /^u[~:  
    gL3"Gg3  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 'gt-s547  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented bcZf>:gVf  
    u@4V7;L  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 kWrp1`  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 q]\g,a  
        v%RP0%%{s  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!