[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: H.ZIRt!RB  
}/a%
-07R  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) oN1D&*  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Y*c]C;%=  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :oIBJ u%/  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 >s^$-  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ?Zb+xNKJ(  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :.x(( FU  
&!8 WRJ  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: %%NoXW  
^)dsi  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT)
ew1L+  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 8:TX9`,  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 bgzd($)u  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 | 1B0  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 -N' (2'  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 KTm^}')C8  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 b-&rMML  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 #z(:n5$F  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! 1:eWZ]B5"  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ,q*
|R 
O  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德